restructure results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2123 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2123
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..66d648311
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/2123
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The problem described is that when running a Rust program under QEMU, specifically with qemu-aarch64, executing a subprocess with a non-existing command doesn't fail as expected. Instead, QEMU still spawns the process and returns an ID. When run normally outside of QEMU, the program correctly handles the error by printing "This should happen".
+
+Hmm, so what's happening here? The Rust code is using Command::new to run a nonexistent binary ("thisdoesnotexist"). Normally, this would throw an error because the command isn't found. But under QEMU, it somehow succeeds and gets a process ID.
+
+I'm thinking about how QEMU handles subprocesses. When you run a program under QEMU, especially for different architectures like AArch64, the emulation might be affecting how system calls are handled. Maybe there's an issue with how QEMU translates or emulates the syscalls related to spawning processes.
+
+Looking at the categories: The options include things like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'device', 'network', etc. Since this is about subprocess execution, which involves system call handling and process management, it might relate to how QEMU's translation layer (like the TCG or KVM) handles these calls.
+
+'Mistranslation' refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target IR/target, which could affect how certain syscalls are emulated. So if the 'spawn()' function is supposed to fail when the command doesn't exist but instead succeeds under QEMU, it might be due to a mistranslation where the error isn't correctly translated or handled.
+
+Alternatively, could it be an issue with how QEMU handles signals or process creation in the emulation? Maybe it's not properly detecting that the command doesn't exist because of some missing translation or incorrect handling of the execve syscall.
+
+Wait, 'mistranslation' seems to fit here. It's about incorrect mapping leading to unexpected behavior. The Rust code correctly fails outside QEMU but works under it, suggesting a problem in how QEMU processes certain instructions related to subprocess spawning.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates that when running a Rust program under QEMU (specifically qemu-aarch64), the program incorrectly spawns a process even though the command doesn't exist. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles system calls related to process creation or error handling, likely due to incorrect translation of certain instructions. 
+
+The most fitting category is 'mistranslation' because it involves incorrect mapping from the source architecture (Rust code) to the target environment in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file