restructure results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1885720 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1885720
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dbee08c5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1885720
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report. The user provided a snippet from QEMU's source code where there's an error in the file `postcopy-ram.c` at line 387. The issue is that the function returns `-1`, but it's supposed to return a boolean value since the function name is `postcopy_ram_supported_by_host()`. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I see options like mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others. Mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mappings from source architecture to IR or target, typically in user-mode. In this case, the bug is about returning an integer instead of a boolean, which is a type mismatch. This seems more related to function return types rather than translation issues.
+
+The other categories like device, graphic, network, etc., don't seem relevant here because the issue is not hardware-related but code logic. The problem is in the function's return value, so it's more of a coding style or type error. However, the categories provided don't have a direct match for this. 
+
+Wait, the user mentioned "mistranslation" as one category, which might relate to incorrect mappings, but here it's about returning the wrong type. Alternatively, maybe it's not mistranslation but rather a function implementation issue. Since none of the other categories fit perfectly, perhaps it falls under 'other' because it's a specific return value problem.
+
+But considering that the bug is in the return expression and style (returning non-boolean from a boolean function), it's more about code correctness than performance or kernel issues. So maybe 'mistranslation' isn't right here. Hmm, perhaps I should look again at what each category means.
+
+Mistranslation: Incorrect semantic mapping—does this fit? The function is supposed to return a bool but returns an integer. It might be seen as a translation issue from the intended logic (returning true/false) to the actual code. Alternatively, it's a type error in the code itself.
+
+Alternatively, 'other' could be the safest choice if none of the specific categories fit exactly. But I'm not entirely sure. Maybe I should think about what each category is supposed to cover. 
+
+The bug report points out that the function returns -1 where a bool is expected. So it's more of a type error in the code, which doesn't directly fall under any of the other specified categories like device, network, etc. Therefore, 'other' seems appropriate since it's not related to translation or assembly but a specific logic error.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue with returning a non-boolean value from a function that expects a boolean return type. This is a type mismatch and a code style issue rather than a mistranslation or assembly problem. Therefore, the correct category is:
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file