restructure results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1920602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1920602
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..40e6d6975
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1920602
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem again to understand what's happening.
+
+The user provided a bug report where running a QuickBASIC program that causes an integer overflow crashes QEMU. The error message points to a specific line in tcg-cpus.c, which is part of the TCG (Translation-Cache Generator) code. This suggests it's related to how QEMU handles machine instructions on the target architecture.
+
+The program they're running is very simple: it assigns an integer value and then prints it. But when the integer overflows, QEMU crashes with an assertion failure in tcg_handle_interrupt. The fact that this happens under MS-DOS or FreeDOS implies it's related to how DOS programs are emulated.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, options like 'mistranslation' could be relevant if there's a wrong mapping from x86 instructions to TCG. However, the error seems more about handling interrupts correctly within QEMU's internal state, which might not directly relate to assembly translation.
+
+Other possible categories include 'device', 'network', or 'kernel', but none of these seem to fit. The issue is happening during emulation under DOS, so maybe it's a problem in how QEMU handles certain system calls or exceptions when running old programs like those compiled with QuickBASIC.
+
+Wait, the error message mentions that the assertion failed because qemu_mutex_iothread_locked() wasn't true. This points to an issue with threading and locks within QEMU's I/O thread during interrupt handling. So it might be a concurrency problem rather than a translation issue.
+
+However, in the context of the provided categories, 'mistranslation' is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture (x86) to IR or target, which happens in user-mode assembly lowering. If the integer overflow leads to an instruction that's not correctly translated by TCG, causing QEMU to mishandle it and crash, then maybe 'assembly' would be more appropriate.
+
+But wait, the error is during interrupt handling, not necessarily during the translation of a specific instruction. Maybe this isn't about assembly lowering but rather how QEMU handles exceptions or signals when certain operations occur, like an integer overflow that leads to unexpected behavior in the emulated program.
+
+Alternatively, 'other' might be the safest category since it's not fitting neatly into the others. The issue is related to handling DOS programs with overflows, which could be a corner case not covered by more specific categories like 'device', 'network', etc.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes QEMU crashing due to an integer overflow in a QuickBASIC program running under DOS. This points to an internal QEMU assertion failure during interrupt handling, likely related to threading or locks, which doesn't fit into the given categories directly. Since it's not about assembly translation but rather an unexpected system behavior, 'other' is the most fitting category.
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file