diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
| commit | dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 (patch) | |
| tree | 418478faf06786701a56268672f73d6b0b4eb239 /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520 | |
| parent | 4d9e26c0333abd39bdbd039dcdb30ed429c475ba (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.tar.gz qemu-analysis-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.zip | |
restructure results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b17abd0fd --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/1520 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description, so let me go through it step by step. + +First, the issue is with x86 TCG acceleration running on s390x systems when using -smp greater than the host's CPUs. This causes a significant slowdown, around 10 times slower. They mentioned that this affects QEMU 7.2 and is related to a specific patch applied in Debian. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other. + +The problem seems to be performance-related because the slowdown is so significant. The user also mentions that this occurs only under certain conditions: when the patch is applied, running x86 on s390x, and when -smp exceeds host CPUs. It doesn't happen with PPC64, which suggests it's specific to the way QEMU handles s390x architecture. + +The performance category fits because the issue is about the speed of execution. The user provided timing data showing a 10x increase in runtime for certain test cases. They also linked this to TCG acceleration, which relates to how QEMU translates code for the target architecture. + +So, considering all factors, the most appropriate category is 'performance'. +</think> + +performance \ No newline at end of file |