summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
commit238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (patch)
treecd8a1b75ba7b3543eb7fe6857f408e7be4d9fd0b /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690
parent96049c939b1916d80532630d63c14e04d5244f1d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.zip
add results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/140469030
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a79b99ebf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1404690
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out why Qemu crashes when I run certain commands like 'ls' or an invalid command inside a chrooted m68k environment using qemu-m68k 2.2.0. Let me start by understanding what's happening.
+
+I set up binfmt_msc to handle m68k binaries, and I have a small program that execs qemu with some arguments including '-strace'. This setup works for running shells like bash or ash, but when I try commands that probably involve more complex operations or perhaps syscalls, Qemu crashes. The error message mentions an illegal instruction at 0x0000 @ f6fffa30 and gives a stack trace of registers.
+
+First, I need to consider possible causes. Since it works for simple commands but not others, maybe the issue is with how certain instructions or syscalls are handled by Qemu. The crash happens during an 'ls' command, which involves file system operations—reading directories, accessing files, etc. Maybe these operations trigger a syscall that Qemu isn't handling correctly.
+
+Looking at the error message: "Illegal instruction: 0000 @ f6fffa30". The address is in user space (as indicated by the 'f' prefix in some contexts), so it's not a kernel issue but something happening within the chrooted process. The illegal instruction could be an unexpected or unsupported opcode for the m68k CPU.
+
+I should check what instruction is at that address. If I can dump the memory around f6fffa30, maybe using gdb attached to Qemu, I can see if it's a known problematic instruction. Alternatively, perhaps this is a bug in how Qemu emulates certain instructions when running under strace or with specific CPU settings.
+
+Another angle: the '-strace' option enables tracing of system calls. Maybe there's an interaction between the tracing and the way syscalls are handled that causes Qemu to misbehave. I could try running without '-strace' to see if the issue persists, which would help determine if strace is involved.
+
+Also, since this happens when running commands that likely make more complex syscalls, it might be a problem with how those particular syscalls are implemented in Qemu's m68k target. For example, maybe some syscalls aren't fully emulated or have bugs in their implementation.
+
+I should also consider updating Qemu to a newer version if possible, as there might have been fixes for such issues since 2.2.0. However, the user is specifically using that version, so perhaps it's an older bug that hasn't been fixed yet.
+
+To debug further, I could try:
+
+1. Running without '-strace' to see if the issue still occurs.
+2. Checking what instruction causes the crash by examining memory at f6fffa30.
+3. Testing with different commands to see if specific syscalls are problematic.
+4. Looking for similar issues in Qemu's bug reports or mailing lists.
+
+If it turns out that the issue is due to a faulty instruction being executed, then it would fall under the 'instruction' category. If it's related to handling syscalls incorrectly, then it might be a 'syscall' issue. Otherwise, if it's another runtime problem, like memory management or threading, then it would be 'runtime'.
+
+Given that the error is an illegal instruction, I'm leaning towards the 'instruction' category. But without more info on why that instruction is being executed, it's hard to say definitively.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file