add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1847467 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1847467
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..210cc0a18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1847467
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to figure out how to classify this bug report about qemu-x86_64. The user provided some details and an example program where QEMU is behaving incorrectly when handling certain segment prefixes in 64-bit mode.
+
+First, let me understand what's happening. In x86_64, according to the Intel manual, segment prefixes like DS, ES, SS, or CS should be ignored because they're not needed in 64-bit mode. The address calculation uses the FS base in this case. However, QEMU is treating these prefixes as if they were active, which leads to incorrect mapping.
+
+The user mentioned that both versions 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 of qemu-x86_64 have this issue. They also provided a sample program where the output differs when run natively versus in QEMU.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem seems to be with how QEMU handles specific instructions—namely those with segment prefixes in 64-bit mode. It's not about system calls or runtime errors in general but rather an incorrect handling of certain opcodes.
+
+So this is likely related to how instructions are decoded and executed. The bug report describes a faulty instruction processing, where the prefixes aren't being ignored as they should be in 64-bit mode. Therefore, it falls under the "instruction" category.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to how specific instructions (with segment prefixes) are processed incorrectly by QEMU in x86_64 mode.
+
+**Answer:** instruction
\ No newline at end of file