add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1901 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1901
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ec69db7c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1901
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is about the fmul8x16 instruction not working correctly when emulating SPARC architectures, specifically UltraSparc II. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+First, the user provided a test program that checks all possible combinations of 16-bit and 8-bit inputs using the fmul8x16 instruction. When they run this on real hardware (UltraSparc II), everything works as expected—all tests pass. However, when they use QEMU (both sparc64 and sparc32plus), almost all tests fail, with results being zero.
+
+Looking at the problem description, it's clear that the issue is with how QEMU handles this specific instruction. The user tried other VIS instructions, which worked fine, so it's isolated to fmul8x16. This points towards a bug in the emulation of that particular instruction rather than a broader issue with the system calls or runtime environment.
+
+The possible categories are instruction, syscall, and runtime. Since the problem is directly related to how an instruction (fmul8x16) is executed and not with any system call or general runtime behavior, it falls under the 'instruction' category. The fact that other instructions work correctly further supports this classification.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with a specific instruction in QEMU's SPARC emulation. Since the problem arises from incorrect handling of the `fmul8x16` instruction, the appropriate category is:
+
+**instruction**
+
+(instruction)
\ No newline at end of file