add results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1909 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1909
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..39e443c02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1909
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I've got this bug report about QEMU 8.0.0 causing a segfault when running a test program that uses gcov for coverage. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
+
+The user provided some debug output from GDB. They set a breakpoint and looked at the disassembly. The instruction in question is "str x8, [x9, #2512]", which is an ARM64 store instruction. It looks like they're trying to write the value of register x8 (which is 1) into memory at address x9 plus 2512. 
+
+When they checked the memory location after stepping through this instruction, it still showed as zero. Then, using llvm-objdump, they found that the target address corresponds to a gcov counter (__llvm_gcov_ctr.5), which is in the .bss section and has a size of 8 bytes.
+
+The user also noted that when running with QEMU 6.2.0, there's no segfault at this point, though there might be another issue later on due to their test program's bug.
+
+So, what's causing the segfault? The fact that it works in 6.2.0 but not in 8.0.0 suggests a regression introduced in QEMU between these versions. Since the error occurs during a memory write operation, it could be related to how QEMU handles certain instructions or memory accesses.
+
+Looking at the instruction: "str x8, [x9, #2512]" is trying to write 4 bytes (since x8 is a 64-bit register but str defaults to 32 bits unless specified otherwise). The target address is in .bss, which should be writable. However, maybe QEMU isn't handling the alignment or the size correctly.
+
+Another angle: perhaps QEMU's memory management for .bss or specific sections has changed, causing the emulator to misbehave when writing to certain addresses. Or maybe it's an issue with how the gcov counters are initialized or accessed in this version of QEMU.
+
+The fact that the same code works on 6.2.0 but not on 8.0.0 points towards a change in QEMU's handling of these operations. It could be related to how memory is mapped, how instructions are emulated, or some other runtime aspect.
+
+I think this falls under an "instruction" issue because the problem occurs during the execution of a specific instruction (str) and seems to be related to how QEMU processes that instruction in terms of memory access.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where executing a specific store instruction in QEMU 8.0.0 leads to a segmentation fault, which does not occur in earlier versions like 6.2.0. This suggests a problem with how the instruction is being handled.
+
+**Answer:** instruction
\ No newline at end of file