add results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/754 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/754
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ab2da2109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/754
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU. The user provided some logs and an explanation of what's happening when they run their test case. Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, looking at the initial problem: when running with certain debug options, the stack pointer isn't what's expected. It shows 80045fe0 instead of 80045fd8. That suggests there might be an issue with how the stack is being managed or something related to memory addressing.
+
+Then, when they run with additional options including -singlestep, they notice that certain instructions aren't executed as expected. Specifically, the linkw and movel instructions are skipped, and instead, an extra orib instruction is being executed. This is odd because those instructions should be part of the normal execution flow.
+
+Looking at the logs, it seems like there's a problem with how the disassembler and translator interpret certain instructions. There's a note about "Disassembler disagrees with translator over instruction decoding," which implies that QEMU's internal components aren't in agreement about what the machine code represents. That's a red flag for an issue in the way instructions are being parsed or translated.
+
+The fact that extra instructions appear when running in single-step mode suggests that there might be a bug in how the CPU state is handled, especially around branching or instruction fetches. Maybe the translator isn't correctly handling a specific opcode, causing it to insert incorrect operations into the execution stream.
+
+Also, considering the user mentioned using "-cpu m68020," this points towards an issue with the 68020 processor emulation in QEMU. The problem arises during instruction decoding and execution, which falls under how the CPU handles instructions—so it's likely related to the handling of specific opcodes or instruction sequences.
+
+Putting it all together: the bug report is about incorrect instruction execution (some not being run as expected, others appearing unexpectedly) due to a disagreement in the disassembler and translator. This points to an issue with how the CPU core handles instructions, specifically an error in the way certain opcodes are translated or executed. Therefore, this falls under the "instruction" category because it's about faulty instruction handling rather than syscalls or runtime errors unrelated to instruction execution.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file