add results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5a8c91e73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/manual-review/1926521
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is that when an application uses MADV_DONTNEED, QEMU isn't handling it correctly. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+The user provided code where they map a page with MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, which means it's private and anonymous—so changes won't be reflected in any file. They write 'A' to the first byte of this mapped area. Then they call madvise with MADV_DONTNEED on that region.
+
+According to the man pages, after MADV_DONTNEED, accessing those pages should result in either reloading from a file (for shared mappings) or zero-filled pages for private anonymous mappings. In this case, since it's MAP_PRIVATE and anonymous, any access should get zeros because the OS can just drop the pages and refill them on next access with zeros.
+
+In the code, after calling madvise, they assert that *P is 0. On the host system, this works as expected, but when run under QEMU, it fails, meaning *P isn't zeroed out, causing an assertion failure.
+
+Looking at the QEMU code, in the syscall.c file, there's a comment saying MADV_DONTNEED is ignored because it's a hint. So QEMU just returns success without doing anything, which explains why the memory isn't cleared as expected.
+
+So this issue is about how QEMU handles a specific system call—madvise with MADV_DONTNEED. Since it's not correctly implementing the expected behavior of the madvise syscall, it falls under a syscall error category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an incorrect handling of the `madvise` system call in QEMU when processing the `MADV_DONTNEED` advice, leading to unexpected memory behavior.
+
+**Answer:** The given bug is classified as a **syscall** issue.
\ No newline at end of file