add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1533141 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1533141
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..27c187f95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1533141
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let me start by understanding what's being reported here. 
+
+The user provided two issues found in the file `invalset.h`. Both are style-related and involve potential array index checks before usage. The first issue is at line 442, where the variable 'low' is used as an index without checking its bounds beforehand. Similarly, at line 450, 'middle' is used without a prior check.
+
+Hmm, the user also mentions that binary search is a standard C library routine and suggests using it instead. So perhaps these are instances of reinventing the wheel with a less efficient or more error-prone implementation.
+
+Now, considering the categories given: instruction, syscall, runtime. The bug doesn't seem to be about an incorrect instruction being generated (so not instruction). It's also not related to system calls directly, so probably not syscall. 
+
+That leaves runtime errors. These issues could lead to accessing invalid array indices, which would cause runtime problems like crashes or undefined behavior. So the problem here is with the runtime execution of QEMU when dealing with these array accesses.
+
+I think the classification should be 'runtime' because it's about potential runtime errors due to incorrect index checks.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file