summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
commit238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (patch)
treecd8a1b75ba7b3543eb7fe6857f408e7be4d9fd0b /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815
parent96049c939b1916d80532630d63c14e04d5244f1d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.zip
add results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/16618159
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1eb9c4bfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1661815
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The report mentions that there's an issue in the function translate_one within target-s390x/translate.c. Specifically, it points out that the address of a local variable "f" is being returned through s->fields. Since "f" is a local variable on the stack, once the function returns, this pointer becomes invalid because the variable goes out of scope.
+
+The problem here is related to undefined behavior as per the C Standard, which could lead to memory corruption or other issues. The suggestion is to sanitize "s->fields" by setting it to null before returning to prevent using an invalid pointer.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Since this issue arises during the execution of the program and relates to improper handling of pointers leading to potential runtime errors (like accessing freed memory or dangling pointers), it falls under runtime issues. It's not directly related to a specific instruction being faulty or a system call error but rather an issue with how the program manages its resources at runtime.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file