add results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1671 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1671
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c11c5ac23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1671
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report as either "instruction," "syscall," or "runtime." Let's look at the information provided.
+
+The user has shared a GDB backtrace from a segfault when running a test binary under QEMU-RISC-V64. The backtrace shows multiple threads and points of failure within QEMU, specifically in functions like `cpu_loop`, `clone_func`, and several gdbstub-related functions.
+
+I'll go through each possible category:
+
+1. **Instruction**: This would involve issues with specific CPU instructions causing the problem. However, looking at the trace, it doesn't mention any particular instruction or disassembly. The issue seems more related to how QEMU handles the program execution rather than a faulty instruction itself.
+
+2. **Syscall**: This category involves errors during system calls. While there are syscalls mentioned in the code (like `do_syscall`), the stack trace points to gdbstub and other internal functions, not necessarily an error in handling a syscall.
+
+3. **Runtime**: This refers to general runtime errors that aren't specifically tied to instructions or syscalls. The segfault seems to occur during the execution loop (`cpu_loop`), which is part of QEMU's runtime environment. Additionally, multiple threads are involved, suggesting a concurrency issue or an error in handling the program's execution flow.
+
+Given the context, the bug isn't directly linked to a specific instruction or syscall but rather how QEMU manages the execution at runtime. Therefore, it falls under "runtime."
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file