diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000 |
| commit | 238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (patch) | |
| tree | cd8a1b75ba7b3543eb7fe6857f408e7be4d9fd0b /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267 | |
| parent | 96049c939b1916d80532630d63c14e04d5244f1d (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.tar.gz qemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.zip | |
add results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..49061e438 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1725267 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user reported an issue after upgrading from version 2.7 to 2.8 and observed it persists in 2.10.1. They're using QEMU for GCC validation with atomic-exchange-4.exe. + +The problem occurs when running a test case involving atomics, which fails in newer QEMU versions but worked before. The error message shows an uncaught signal 6 (Aborted), leading to a core dump and exit code 134. + +Looking at the disassembly output with -d in_asm, there's a difference early in the startup code between QEMU 2.7 and 2.10.1. Specifically, the instruction at 0x40a17790 changes from 'addls pc, pc, r3, lsl #2' to something else. + +The key here is that the issue arises during execution, not necessarily with a specific system call or an invalid instruction. It's more about how QEMU handles the code at runtime, particularly in the context of atomic operations which involve low-level memory handling and concurrency. + +So considering the categories: 'instruction', 'syscall', or 'runtime'. Since it's related to how QEMU processes the code during execution rather than a specific syscall error or an invalid instruction being described, I think this falls under 'runtime'. +</think> + +The issue occurs during runtime when executing atomic operations, leading to an abort signal. It's not about an incorrect instruction or system call but the handling of code execution. + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |