add results

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..df31ca6a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1756807
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out what's going on here. The user has reported that running a command inside a chroot using proot and qemu-user is significantly slower on Ubuntu 18.04 compared to 16.04. They've provided logs from both systems showing the time taken for the same operation.
+
+First, I notice that the real time jumped from about 0.066 seconds to over 24 seconds. That's a massive increase—over 100 times slower. The user mentioned that proot hasn't changed between the two systems but qemu has been updated. So, it's possible that this issue is related to changes in the qemu version.
+
+Looking at the system specs, System 2 (Ubuntu 18.04) is lower spec than System 1 (16.04), but not by a huge margin. The CPU on System 1 is an i7-6700, which is more powerful than the i5-5300U in System 2, but even so, the performance hit seems too large for that difference alone.
+
+The user is using proot with qemu-arm-static to run a chroot. The command they're timing is a simple grep inside /usr/share/doc. The fact that this specific command is slow suggests it's something about how the emulation or the filesystem is handled.
+
+Looking at the logs, in System 1 (Ubuntu 16.04), the user time was 0.040s and sys time 0.008s, which are both very low. In contrast, on System 2, user time is 0.366s and sys time is a whopping 11.352s. The high system time suggests that the kernel is spending a lot of time handling this process, possibly due to increased overhead in the emulation layer.
+
+The qemu version in System 1 is 2.10.1, while in System 2 it's 2.11.1. I know that between these versions, there were some changes, especially in how qemu handles certain system calls or filesystem operations. It could be a regression introduced in the newer version.
+
+I should check if others have reported similar issues with qemu-user in Ubuntu 18.04. Maybe looking up bug reports related to performance regressions when using proot and qemu-arm-static would shed some light. If there's an existing issue, it might be that this is a known problem or at least something being looked into.
+
+Another angle could be filesystem handling. The user mentioned the chroot is just a Debian bootstrap, so maybe the way the files are accessed in the chroot is causing inefficiency. Perhaps newer qemu versions have more strict checks or different caching mechanisms that aren't as efficient as before.
+
+Also, considering that proot hasn't changed, but the environment has (different kernel, libraries), it might be an interaction between qemu and the host system's components. For example, changes in how syscalls are handled by the kernel could affect performance when using emulated environments.
+
+The fact that other software isn't affected suggests that the issue is specific to this particular setup—using proot with qemu-user for arm emulation. So it's not a general system slowdown but something particular to these tools working together in this configuration.
+
+Putting it all together, the bug seems to be related to how the newer version of qemu is handling certain operations when used with proot. The high sys time indicates that the issue occurs during runtime execution—maybe handling syscalls or filesystem operations less efficiently than before.
+
+Therefore, I would classify this as a runtime error because the problem arises during the execution of the process rather than being an instruction fault or a syscall error per se.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file