add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1808563 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1808563
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..660597937
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1808563
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what's going on here. The user is experiencing an issue where listing the contents of '/' using qemu-arm doesn't show the expected directories but instead shows something related to QEMU_LD_PREFIX.
+
+So, in their example, when they run 'ls /', it lists 'etc lib usr' which seems to be the contents of the directory set by QEMU_LD_PREFIX. But when they actually run 'ls /' on their system, it's showing a normal filesystem structure with boot, bin, etc. This suggests that when using qemu-arm, the root directory is being remapped or intercepted incorrectly.
+
+Looking at strace output, there's an openat call targeting '/tmp/qemu/usr/armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi', which indicates that QEMU is trying to access a different directory than intended. The user also mentions that changing the code to use chdir("/"); opendir(".") works fine, implying that it's related to how directories are being opened or handled in QEMU.
+
+Now, thinking about the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Instruction issues would involve incorrect assembly or specific CPU instructions causing problems. Syscall errors relate directly to system calls like open, read, etc., not working as expected. Runtime issues could encompass a broader range of operational problems during execution that aren't tied to specific instructions or syscalls.
+
+In this case, the problem seems to be with how QEMU is handling directory operations when using certain prefixes. It's causing files in the wrong directory to be listed. The strace shows openat being used on the QEMU_LD_PREFIX path instead of the actual root. This points more towards a runtime issue because it's about the execution environment and how directories are handled, possibly due to configuration or setup within QEMU rather than a faulty instruction or a problem with individual syscalls.
+
+So I think this is a runtime bug because it's related to how QEMU operates during execution when handling directory lookups, specifically when certain prefixes are set.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file