add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1883784 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1883784
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c1bc40912
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1883784
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let me break it down step by step.
+
+The user reports that their code runs correctly on actual PPC64LE hardware when compiled with GCC 10 but fails in QEMU environments (both version 4.2 and 5.0.0). The failure isn't due to an error like an illegal instruction; instead, the computed results are different, leading to a __builtin_abort because it doesn't match the expected value.
+
+First, I'll consider the "instruction" category. This would involve issues with how instructions are executed. Since there's no mention of illegal instructions or execution errors, this seems unlikely. The problem isn't about an instruction being faulty but rather about incorrect computation results.
+
+Next, the "syscall" category relates to system calls going wrong. The user didn't mention any syscall-related issues, so this doesn't fit either. They're not talking about problems with permissions or syscalls failing; it's more about the program logic.
+
+That leaves me with "runtime," which covers other runtime errors that aren't related to instructions or syscalls. Since the problem is about different results when running on QEMU versus hardware, it suggests something in the environment causing the issue during execution. It could be a difference in how floating-point operations are handled, memory management, or some other runtime behavior discrepancy.
+
+So, putting it all together: The bug isn't an instruction or syscall issue but rather a runtime problem where QEMU behaves differently than actual hardware.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file