summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000
commit238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (patch)
treecd8a1b75ba7b3543eb7fe6857f408e7be4d9fd0b /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802
parent96049c939b1916d80532630d63c14e04d5244f1d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.zip
add results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/280217
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..34c87229e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2802
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that it's part of QEMU and provided some context about the issue. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+First, the problem involves the `fdtox` and `fqtox` instructions in SPARC. These instructions are not correctly selecting the destination register when it's higher than `f31`. The test program shows that instead of getting 60, it prints 0. That suggests something is wrong with how the registers are being handled.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: they're using a cross-compiler and QEMU to run a test program. The issue arises during execution when using these specific instructions, which means it's happening while the code is running, not during compilation or system calls.
+
+The user also mentions that this bug was introduced by a commit related to how destination registers are selected in the decoder tree. This points towards an issue with how instructions are being processed at runtime rather than a problem with the compiler or system calls themselves.
+
+So, considering the categories: instruction, syscall, and runtime. The problem is clearly not with a system call since it's about assembly instructions. It also isn't about a faulty instruction per se, but more about how registers are handled during execution. Therefore, this falls under a runtime error because it occurs while the program is running.
+
+I think the category should be 'runtime' because it involves an issue that happens at execution time due to incorrect register selection.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with how destination registers are selected during instruction processing in QEMU. Since it's related to the execution of specific instructions and their handling, it falls under a runtime error.
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file