add results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/922 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/922
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d1094fdad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/922
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is experiencing random segmentation faults when running `grep` using `qemu-arm-static`. Let me break down the details provided.
+
+First, the issue occurs when they run a loop that executes `/qemu /bin/grep -E f text > /dev/null`. Sometimes it happens quickly, other times after several thousand iterations. The problem is present in QEMU versions 7.0.0-rc0, 6.2, 5.2, and 5.1 but not in 5.0. They've provided a test environment which includes building a Docker container and running an ARM bash shell.
+
+The error they get is a segmentation fault, which typically indicates a memory access issue—like accessing invalid memory addresses or dereferencing null pointers. Since this happens when executing `grep`, it's likely related to how QEMU emulates the execution of this ARM binary on an x86_64 host.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories:
+
+- **instruction**: This would be if there was a faulty instruction being executed by QEMU that causes the issue. For example, a specific CPU instruction causing a problem.
+  
+- **syscall**: This relates to errors when handling system calls. If `grep` is making a syscall that QEMU isn't handling correctly, this could cause issues.
+
+- **runtime**: This covers other runtime errors not necessarily tied to instructions or syscalls, like memory management problems or bugs in the emulation logic.
+
+In this case, since the segmentation fault occurs during the execution of an ARM binary (specifically `grep`), it's more likely related to how QEMU handles the binary's execution rather than a specific instruction or syscall. It could be an issue with how memory is being managed in the emulator, leading to incorrect access patterns that cause the segfault.
+
+Considering that this started happening from version 5.1 onwards but didn't occur in 5.0, it suggests a regression introduced in a newer version of QEMU. This might point towards changes in the emulation logic or memory handling between versions.
+
+Therefore, I think the most appropriate category is **runtime**, as it's an issue that arises during the execution (runtime) of the emulated program within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file