add new results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/2474 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/2474
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9db4e8476
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/2474
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out what's going on here. The user is reporting an issue with the QEMU translation of the x86 instruction vpgatherqq. Specifically, when the XMM4 register is involved, the offset in the generated code is incorrect. 
+
+Looking at the problem steps, they provided an example where the offset for XMM4 is calculated as 0x310 instead of the expected 0x450. They mention that the XMM registers are in a continuous structure called CPUArchState, so their offsets should form an arithmetic sequence with a common difference of 0x40. So XMM2 would be at 0x3d0, XMM3 at 0x410, XMM4 at 0x450, etc. But in the output, XMM4 is at 0x310, which is way off. 
+
+The user tracked the issue to a part of the QEMU code in translate.c, specifically in the gen_lea_modrm_0 function. The code there checks if the index is 4 and sets it to -1, which means "no index". They suspect this is causing the incorrect offset calculation.
+
+So, the problem is in how QEMU's translator is handling the MODRM/SIB encoding for the vpgatherqq instruction when XMM4 is used. The code in gen_lea_modrm_0 is treating index 4 as invalid, which leads to incorrect address calculation. This seems to be an error in the instruction decoding or translation process within QEMU's TCG (Tiny Code Generator) for x86.
+
+Since the issue is directly related to the translation of the x86 instruction into QEMU's internal operations, and it's a mistake in the generated code due to incorrect handling of the register index, this would fall under an "instruction" bug category. The problem is with how QEMU translates the specific x86 instruction into its internal representation, leading to incorrect execution. It's not a runtime error in the traditional sense, nor a syscall issue. Therefore, the correct category is "instruction".
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file