add new results

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/508 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/508
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ca00d25c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/instruction/508
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting that the x86_64 cmpxchg behavior in QEMU's TCG (Tiny Code Generator) doesn't match the real CPU. I need to classify this bug report into one of the three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+First, I should recall what each category means. The "instruction" category is for when a specific instruction is implemented incorrectly. "Syscall" would be if the issue is with system calls, which are interactions with the operating system. "Runtime" is for other runtime errors not related to specific instructions or syscalls.
+
+The cmpxchg instruction is an x86 instruction used for compare-and-exchange operations, which is crucial for synchronization in multi-threaded programs. The problem here is that QEMU's TCG is not emulating this instruction correctly compared to real hardware. Since the issue is directly about the execution of a specific CPU instruction, this would fall under the "instruction" category. There's no mention of system calls here, and it's about the instruction's behavior, so runtime is probably not the right choice. Therefore, the correct category is "instruction".
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file