add new results

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/578 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/578
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4fe3090d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/578
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with the getdomainname() function in QEMU user mode on Linux/sparc64. The problem is that when they run their compiled program on an actual sparc64 machine, it works (printing "result: (none)"), but when they run it under QEMU, they get an error saying "Function not implemented". 
+
+Hmm. The key here is that getdomainname() is a system call. The program is expecting that this system call will work, but QEMU isn't handling it properly. The user has provided steps to reproduce, including compiling the code with sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc and running it both on real hardware and under QEMU. The issue only occurs in QEMU.
+
+So, QEMU user mode emulates the system calls for the target architecture. If a system call isn't implemented in QEMU, then when the guest program (the sparc64 program in this case) tries to make that system call, QEMU can't translate it to the host's equivalent and thus returns an error. In this case, getdomainname() is not implemented in the QEMU user mode for sparc64 on Linux. 
+
+The categories given are instruction, syscall, or runtime. Since the problem is that the system call isn't implemented in QEMU, leading to the error, this should be categorized under syscall. Instruction would be if there was a wrong instruction being executed, but here it's about handling the system call. Runtime errors are other issues during execution, but this is specifically a missing syscall implementation. So the correct category is syscall.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file