summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-07 17:18:14 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-07 17:18:14 +0000
commit61361f925d4914a6608a0076e64cc2399311ed5f (patch)
tree6f717c2ff0b11d7493e60da9757818d119cfb541 /results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836
parent238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-61361f925d4914a6608a0076e64cc2399311ed5f.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-61361f925d4914a6608a0076e64cc2399311ed5f.zip
add new results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/8367
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..46f6d9abc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/836
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with QEMU's RISC-V 32-bit emulator where the lseek() system call returns -14, which is EFAULT. The problem is that even when the file descriptor is correct, it's returning this error. The code provided uses syscall numbers for RISC-V, specifically using SYS_LSEEK. The steps to reproduce involve assembling and linking a test program, then running it with qemu-riscv32.
+
+The key here is that the issue is with the lseek syscall returning an incorrect error code. The user mentions that according to the man page, lseek shouldn't return EFAULT in this scenario. Since QEMU is the emulator in question here, and the problem is related to how the syscall is handled within QEMU, this would fall under the syscall category. The bug is in how QEMU processes the lseek system call for RISC-V, leading to an incorrect error code. It's not an instruction issue because the problem isn't about executing the wrong instruction, but rather handling the syscall parameters or the syscall itself incorrectly. It's also not a general runtime error but specifically a syscall handling problem. So the category should be 'syscall'.
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file