diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-08 13:28:15 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-08 13:28:28 +0200 |
| commit | 5aa276efcbd67f4300ca1a7f809c6e00aadb03da (patch) | |
| tree | 9b8f0e074014cda8d42f5a97a95bc25082d8b764 /results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 | |
| parent | 1a3c4faf4e0a25ed0b86e8739d5319a634cb9112 (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-5aa276efcbd67f4300ca1a7f809c6e00aadb03da.tar.gz qemu-analysis-5aa276efcbd67f4300ca1a7f809c6e00aadb03da.zip | |
restructure results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5dde2435f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/instruction/2319 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +instruction: 0.509 +runtime: 0.259 +syscall: 0.232 + + + +SPARC32-bit SDIV of negative divisor gives wrong result +Description of problem: +SDIV of negative divisor gives wrong result because of typo in helper_sdiv(). This is true for QEMU 9.0.0 and earlier. + +Place -1 in the Y register and -128 in another reg, then -120 in another register and do SDIV into a result register, instead of the proper value of 1 for the result, the incorrect value of 0 is produced. + +There is a typo in target/sparc/helper.c that causes the divisor to be consider unsigned, this patch fixes it: + +\*\*\* helper.c.ori Tue Apr 23 16:23:45 2024 --- helper.c Mon Apr 29 20:14:07 2024 + +--- + +\*\*\* 121,127 \*\*\*\* return (uint32_t)(b32 \< 0 ? INT32_MAX : INT32_MIN) | (-1ull \<\< 32); } + +! a64 /= b; r = a64; if (unlikely(r != a64)) { return (uint32_t)(a64 \< 0 ? INT32_MIN : INT32_MAX) | (-1ull \<\< 32); --- 121,127 ---- return (uint32_t)(b32 \< 0 ? INT32_MAX : INT32_MIN) | (-1ull \<\< 32); } + +! a64 /= b32; r = a64; if (unlikely(r != a64)) { return (uint32_t)(a64 \< 0 ? INT32_MIN : INT32_MAX) | (-1ull \<\< 32); |