diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-07 17:23:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-07 17:23:11 +0000 |
| commit | c50b0c4da17b6e83640e4ed2380fffb5f507c846 (patch) | |
| tree | b4f203fce1380e2ea3578a784bb8ee060fe42cbd /results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 | |
| parent | 61361f925d4914a6608a0076e64cc2399311ed5f (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-c50b0c4da17b6e83640e4ed2380fffb5f507c846.tar.gz qemu-analysis-c50b0c4da17b6e83640e4ed2380fffb5f507c846.zip | |
add zero-shot results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 | 41 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..950e16d83 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot-user-mode/output/instruction/1837 @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +instruction: 0.576 +syscall: 0.243 +runtime: 0.181 + + + +Support IP_MULTICAST_IF socket option in linux-user +Additional information: +I've run into this limitation in qemu-aarch64-static version Debian 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.12, but from the link above, it doesn't seem to be implemented on master yet. + +Here's some source code that demonstrates the failure: +``` +#include <sys/socket.h> +#include <arpa/inet.h> +#include <netinet/ip.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <stdio.h> + +int main() +{ + int fd, ret; + struct in_addr addr = {htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK)}; + + fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP); + assert(fd >= 0); + ret = setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_IF, &addr, sizeof(addr)); + if (ret < 0) + { + perror("setsockopt failed"); + return 1; + } + close(fd); + printf("Success!\n"); + return 0; +} +``` + +When run under qemu, it gives the error `setsockopt failed: Protocol not available`. + +It doesn't look like it should be too hard to support (certainly no worse than IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP). Let me know if I can help with a patch. |