restructure results

1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/zero-shot/111/performance/1228285 b/results/classifier/zero-shot/111/performance/1228285
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e78ccbafd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/zero-shot/111/performance/1228285
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+performance: 0.216
+socket: 0.146
+other: 0.109
+semantic: 0.105
+network: 0.092
+device: 0.072
+vnc: 0.057
+PID: 0.056
+debug: 0.035
+permissions: 0.028
+graphic: 0.023
+files: 0.023
+KVM: 0.022
+boot: 0.017
+performance: 0.609
+network: 0.168
+debug: 0.112
+socket: 0.049
+device: 0.015
+boot: 0.009
+files: 0.008
+PID: 0.008
+vnc: 0.007
+other: 0.007
+semantic: 0.005
+permissions: 0.003
+graphic: 0.001
+KVM: 0.001
+
+e1000 nic TCP performances
+
+Hi,
+
+Here is the context :
+
+$ qemu -name A -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,listen=127.0.0.1:7000
+$ qemu -name B -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,connect=127.0.0.1:7000
+
+The bandwidth is really tiny :
+
+    . Iperf3 reports about 30 Mb/sec
+    . NetPerf reports about 50 Mb/sec
+
+
+With UDP sockets, there is no problem at all :
+
+    . Iperf3 reports about 1 Gb/sec
+    . NetPerf reports about 950 Mb/sec
+
+
+I've noticed this fact only with the e1000 NIC, not with others (rtl8139,virtio, etc.)
+I've used the main GIT version of QEMU.
+
+
+Thanks in advance.
+
+See you,
+VInce
+
+On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 05:21:23PM -0000, Vincent Autefage wrote:
+> Here is the context :
+> 
+> $ qemu -name A -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,listen=127.0.0.1:7000
+> $ qemu -name B -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,connect=127.0.0.1:7000
+> 
+> The bandwidth is really tiny :
+> 
+>     . Iperf3 reports about 30 Mb/sec
+>     . NetPerf reports about 50 Mb/sec
+> 
+> 
+> With UDP sockets, there is no problem at all :
+> 
+>     . Iperf3 reports about 1 Gb/sec
+>     . NetPerf reports about 950 Mb/sec
+> 
+> 
+> I've noticed this fact only with the e1000 NIC, not with others (rtl8139,virtio, etc.)
+> I've used the main GIT version of QEMU.
+
+It's interesting that you see good performance over -netdev socket TCP
+with the other NIC models.
+
+I don't know what the issue would be, you'll probably need to dig
+further to discover the problem.  Using wireshark might be a good start.
+Try to figure out where the delay is incurred and then instrument that
+code to find out the cause.
+
+Stefan
+
+
+Looking through old bug tickets... can you still reproduce this issue with the latest version of QEMU? Or could we close this ticket nowadays?
+
+[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+