1 files changed, 1079 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/012/risc-v/70294255 b/results/classifier/012/risc-v/70294255
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..150f245a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/012/risc-v/70294255
@@ -0,0 +1,1079 @@
+risc-v: 0.863
+mistranslation: 0.862
+assembly: 0.861
+PID: 0.859
+semantic: 0.858
+socket: 0.858
+device: 0.857
+graphic: 0.857
+arm: 0.856
+debug: 0.854
+permissions: 0.854
+other: 0.852
+architecture: 0.851
+performance: 0.850
+network: 0.846
+register: 0.842
+vnc: 0.837
+files: 0.832
+boot: 0.811
+x86: 0.803
+TCG: 0.792
+kernel virtual machine: 0.748
+
+[Qemu-devel] 答复: Re:   答复: Re:  答复: Re: 答复: Re: [BUG]COLO failover hang
+
+hi:
+
+yes.it is better.
+
+And should we delete 
+
+
+
+
+#ifdef WIN32
+
+    QIO_CHANNEL(cioc)-＞event = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL)
+
+#endif
+
+
+
+
+in qio_channel_socket_accept？
+
+qio_channel_socket_new already have it.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+原始邮件
+
+
+
+发件人： address@hidden
+收件人：王广10165992
+抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
+日 期 ：2017年03月22日 15:03
+主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  答复: Re: 答复: Re: [BUG]COLO failover hang
+
+
+
+
+
+Hi,
+
+On 2017/3/22 9:42, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ diff --git a/migration/socket.c b/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ index 13966f1..d65a0ea 100644
+＞
+＞
+＞ --- a/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ +++ b/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ static gboolean 
+socket_accept_incoming_migration(QIOChannel *ioc,
+＞
+＞
+＞       }
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞       trace_migration_socket_incoming_accepted()
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞       qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), "migration-socket-incoming")
+＞
+＞
+＞ +    qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)
+＞
+＞
+＞       migration_channel_process_incoming(migrate_get_current(),
+＞
+＞
+＞                                          QIO_CHANNEL(sioc))
+＞
+＞
+＞       object_unref(OBJECT(sioc))
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ Is this patch ok?
+＞
+
+Yes, i think this works, but a better way maybe to call 
+qio_channel_set_feature()
+in qio_channel_socket_accept(), we didn't set the SHUTDOWN feature for the 
+socket accept fd,
+Or fix it by this:
+
+diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c
+index f546c68..ce6894c 100644
+--- a/io/channel-socket.c
++++ b/io/channel-socket.c
+@@ -330,9 +330,8 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc,
+                            Error **errp)
+  {
+      QIOChannelSocket *cioc
+-
+-    cioc = QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET(object_new(TYPE_QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET))
+-    cioc-＞fd = -1
++
++    cioc = qio_channel_socket_new()
+      cioc-＞remoteAddrLen = sizeof(ioc-＞remoteAddr)
+      cioc-＞localAddrLen = sizeof(ioc-＞localAddr)
+
+
+Thanks,
+Hailiang
+
+＞ I have test it . The test could not hang any more.
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ 原始邮件
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ 发件人： address@hidden
+＞ 收件人： address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ 抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ 日 期 ：2017年03月22日 09:11
+＞ 主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  答复: Re: [BUG]COLO failover hang
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ On 2017/3/21 19:56, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
+＞ ＞ * Hailiang Zhang (address@hidden) wrote:
+＞ ＞＞ Hi,
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Thanks for reporting this, and i confirmed it in my test, and it is a bug.
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Though we tried to call qemu_file_shutdown() to shutdown the related fd, in
+＞ ＞＞ case COLO thread/incoming thread is stuck in read/write() while do 
+failover,
+＞ ＞＞ but it didn't take effect, because all the fd used by COLO (also migration)
+＞ ＞＞ has been wrapped by qio channel, and it will not call the shutdown API if
+＞ ＞＞ we didn't qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN).
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ I doubted migration cancel has the same problem, it may be stuck in write()
+＞ ＞＞ if we tried to cancel migration.
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ void fd_start_outgoing_migration(MigrationState *s, const char *fdname, 
+Error **errp)
+＞ ＞＞ {
+＞ ＞＞      qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(ioc), "migration-fd-outgoing")
+＞ ＞＞      migration_channel_connect(s, ioc, NULL)
+＞ ＞＞      ... ...
+＞ ＞＞ We didn't call qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN) above,
+＞ ＞＞ and the
+＞ ＞＞ migrate_fd_cancel()
+＞ ＞＞ {
+＞ ＞＞   ... ...
+＞ ＞＞      if (s-＞state == MIGRATION_STATUS_CANCELLING && f) {
+＞ ＞＞          qemu_file_shutdown(f)  --＞ This will not take effect. No ?
+＞ ＞＞      }
+＞ ＞＞ }
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞ (cc'd in Daniel Berrange).
+＞ ＞ I see that we call qio_channel_set_feature(ioc, 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN) at the
+＞ ＞ top of qio_channel_socket_new  so I think that's safe isn't it?
+＞ ＞
+＞
+＞ Hmm, you are right, this problem is only exist for the migration incoming fd, 
+thanks.
+＞
+＞ ＞ Dave
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞ Thanks,
+＞ ＞＞ Hailiang
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ On 2017/3/21 16:10, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ Thank you。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I have test aready。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ When the Primary Node panic,the Secondary Node qemu hang at the same 
+place。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Incorrding
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+，kill Primary Node 
+qemu will not produce the problem,but Primary Node panic can。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I think due to the feature of channel does not support 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ when failover,channel_shutdown could not shut down the channel.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ so the colo_process_incoming_thread will hang at recvmsg.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I test a patch:
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ diff --git a/migration/socket.c b/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ index 13966f1..d65a0ea 100644
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ --- a/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ +++ b/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ static gboolean 
+socket_accept_incoming_migration(QIOChannel *ioc,
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        }
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        trace_migration_socket_incoming_accepted()
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+"migration-socket-incoming")
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ +    qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        migration_channel_process_incoming(migrate_get_current(),
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞                                           QIO_CHANNEL(sioc))
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        object_unref(OBJECT(sioc))
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ My test will not hang any more.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ 原始邮件
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ 发件人： address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 收件人：王广10165992 address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 日 期 ：2017年03月21日 15:58
+＞ ＞＞＞ 主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  [BUG]COLO failover hang
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Hi,Wang.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ You can test this branch:
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+https://github.com/coloft/qemu/tree/colo-v5.1-developing-COLO-frame-v21-with-shared-disk
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ and please follow wiki ensure your own configuration correctly.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ On 03/21/2017 03:27 PM, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ hi.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ I test the git qemu master have the same problem.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #0  qio_channel_socket_readv (ioc=0x7f65911b4e50, iov=0x7f64ef3fd880,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ niov=1, fds=0x0, nfds=0x0, errp=0x0) at io/channel-socket.c:461
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #1  0x00007f658e4aa0c2 in qio_channel_read
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (address@hidden, address@hidden "",
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden, address@hidden) at io/channel.c:114
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #2  0x00007f658e3ea990 in channel_get_buffer (opaque=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ buf=0x7f65907cb838 "", pos=＜optimized out＞, size=32768) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file-channel.c:78
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #3  0x00007f658e3e97fc in qemu_fill_buffer (f=0x7f65907cb800) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:295
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #4  0x00007f658e3ea2e1 in qemu_peek_byte (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/qemu-file.c:555
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #5  0x00007f658e3ea34b in qemu_get_byte (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:568
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #6  0x00007f658e3ea552 in qemu_get_be32 (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:648
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #7  0x00007f658e3e66e5 in colo_receive_message (f=0x7f65907cb800,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/colo.c:244
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #8  0x00007f658e3e681e in colo_receive_check_message (f=＜optimized
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ out＞, address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden)
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞     at migration/colo.c:264
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #9  0x00007f658e3e740e in colo_process_incoming_thread
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (opaque=0x7f658eb30360 ＜mis_current.31286＞) at migration/colo.c:577
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #10 0x00007f658be09df3 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #11 0x00007f65881983ed in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞name
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $2 = 0x7f658ff7d5c0 "migration-socket-incoming"
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞features        Do not support QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $3 = 0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #0  socket_accept_incoming_migration (ioc=0x7fdcceeafa90,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ condition=G_IO_IN, opaque=0x7fdcceeafa90) at migration/socket.c:137
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #1  0x00007fdcc6966350 in g_main_dispatch (context=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ gmain.c:3054
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #2  g_main_context_dispatch (context=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at gmain.c:3630
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #3  0x00007fdccb8a6dcc in glib_pollfds_poll () at util/main-loop.c:213
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #4  os_host_main_loop_wait (timeout=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ util/main-loop.c:258
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #5  main_loop_wait (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ util/main-loop.c:506
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #6  0x00007fdccb526187 in main_loop () at vl.c:1898
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #7  main (argc=＜optimized out＞, argv=＜optimized out＞, envp=＜optimized
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ out＞) at vl.c:4709
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞features
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $1 = 6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞name
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $2 = 0x7fdcce1b1ab0 "migration-socket-listener"
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ May be socket_accept_incoming_migration should
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ call qio_channel_set_feature(ioc, QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)??
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ thank you.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ 原始邮件
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden@huawei.com＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ *日 期 ：*2017年03月16日 14:46
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ *主 题 ：**Re: [Qemu-devel] COLO failover hang*
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ On 03/15/2017 05:06 PM, wangguang wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞   am testing QEMU COLO feature described here [QEMU
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Wiki](
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+).
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ When the Primary Node panic,the Secondary Node qemu hang.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ hang at recvmsg in qio_channel_socket_readv.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ And  I run  { 'execute': 'nbd-server-stop' } and { "execute":
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ "x-colo-lost-heartbeat" } in Secondary VM's
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ monitor,the  Secondary Node qemu still hang at recvmsg .
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ I found that the colo in qemu is not complete yet.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Do the colo have any plan for development?
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Yes, We are developing. You can see some of patch we pushing.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Has anyone ever run it successfully? Any help is appreciated!
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ In our internal version can run it successfully,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ The failover detail you can ask Zhanghailiang for help.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Next time if you have some question about COLO,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ please cc me and zhanghailiang address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ centos7.2+qemu2.7.50
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #0  0x00007f3e00cc86ad in recvmsg () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #1  0x00007f3e0332b738 in qio_channel_socket_readv (ioc=＜optimized 
+out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ iov=＜optimized out＞, niov=＜optimized out＞, fds=0x0, nfds=0x0, 
+errp=0x0) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ io/channel-socket.c:497
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #2  0x00007f3e03329472 in qio_channel_read (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden "", address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at io/channel.c:97
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #3  0x00007f3e032750e0 in channel_get_buffer (opaque=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ buf=0x7f3e05910f38 "", pos=＜optimized out＞, size=32768) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file-channel.c:78
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #4  0x00007f3e0327412c in qemu_fill_buffer (f=0x7f3e05910f00) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:257
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #5  0x00007f3e03274a41 in qemu_peek_byte (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/qemu-file.c:510
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #6  0x00007f3e03274aab in qemu_get_byte (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:523
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #7  0x00007f3e03274cb2 in qemu_get_be32 (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:603
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #8  0x00007f3e03271735 in colo_receive_message (f=0x7f3e05910f00,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/colo.c:215
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #9  0x00007f3e0327250d in colo_wait_handle_message 
+(errp=0x7f3d62bfaa48,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ checkpoint_request=＜synthetic pointer＞, f=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/colo.c:546
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #10 colo_process_incoming_thread (opaque=0x7f3e067245e0) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/colo.c:649
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #11 0x00007f3e00cc1df3 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #12 0x00007f3dfc9c03ed in clone () from /lib64/libc..so.6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ View this message in context:
+http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/COLO-failover-hang-tp473250.html
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Sent from the Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞ Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞ .
+＞ ＞
+＞
+
+On 2017/3/22 16:09, address@hidden wrote:
+hi:
+
+yes.it is better.
+
+And should we delete
+Yes, you are right.
+#ifdef WIN32
+
+     QIO_CHANNEL(cioc)-＞event = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL)
+
+#endif
+
+
+
+
+in qio_channel_socket_accept？
+
+qio_channel_socket_new already have it.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+原始邮件
+
+
+
+发件人： address@hidden
+收件人：王广10165992
+抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
+日 期 ：2017年03月22日 15:03
+主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  答复: Re: 答复: Re: [BUG]COLO failover hang
+
+
+
+
+
+Hi,
+
+On 2017/3/22 9:42, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ diff --git a/migration/socket.c b/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ index 13966f1..d65a0ea 100644
+＞
+＞
+＞ --- a/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ +++ b/migration/socket.c
+＞
+＞
+＞ @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ static gboolean 
+socket_accept_incoming_migration(QIOChannel *ioc,
+＞
+＞
+＞       }
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞       trace_migration_socket_incoming_accepted()
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞       qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), "migration-socket-incoming")
+＞
+＞
+＞ +    qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)
+＞
+＞
+＞       migration_channel_process_incoming(migrate_get_current(),
+＞
+＞
+＞                                          QIO_CHANNEL(sioc))
+＞
+＞
+＞       object_unref(OBJECT(sioc))
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ Is this patch ok?
+＞
+
+Yes, i think this works, but a better way maybe to call 
+qio_channel_set_feature()
+in qio_channel_socket_accept(), we didn't set the SHUTDOWN feature for the 
+socket accept fd,
+Or fix it by this:
+
+diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c
+index f546c68..ce6894c 100644
+--- a/io/channel-socket.c
++++ b/io/channel-socket.c
+@@ -330,9 +330,8 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc,
+                             Error **errp)
+   {
+       QIOChannelSocket *cioc
+-
+-    cioc = QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET(object_new(TYPE_QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET))
+-    cioc-＞fd = -1
++
++    cioc = qio_channel_socket_new()
+       cioc-＞remoteAddrLen = sizeof(ioc-＞remoteAddr)
+       cioc-＞localAddrLen = sizeof(ioc-＞localAddr)
+
+
+Thanks,
+Hailiang
+
+＞ I have test it . The test could not hang any more.
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ 原始邮件
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ 发件人： address@hidden
+＞ 收件人： address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ 抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ 日 期 ：2017年03月22日 09:11
+＞ 主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  答复: Re: [BUG]COLO failover hang
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞
+＞ On 2017/3/21 19:56, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
+＞ ＞ * Hailiang Zhang (address@hidden) wrote:
+＞ ＞＞ Hi,
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Thanks for reporting this, and i confirmed it in my test, and it is a bug.
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Though we tried to call qemu_file_shutdown() to shutdown the related fd, in
+＞ ＞＞ case COLO thread/incoming thread is stuck in read/write() while do 
+failover,
+＞ ＞＞ but it didn't take effect, because all the fd used by COLO (also migration)
+＞ ＞＞ has been wrapped by qio channel, and it will not call the shutdown API if
+＞ ＞＞ we didn't qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN).
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ I doubted migration cancel has the same problem, it may be stuck in write()
+＞ ＞＞ if we tried to cancel migration.
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ void fd_start_outgoing_migration(MigrationState *s, const char *fdname, 
+Error **errp)
+＞ ＞＞ {
+＞ ＞＞      qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(ioc), "migration-fd-outgoing")
+＞ ＞＞      migration_channel_connect(s, ioc, NULL)
+＞ ＞＞      ... ...
+＞ ＞＞ We didn't call qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN) above,
+＞ ＞＞ and the
+＞ ＞＞ migrate_fd_cancel()
+＞ ＞＞ {
+＞ ＞＞   ... ...
+＞ ＞＞      if (s-＞state == MIGRATION_STATUS_CANCELLING && f) {
+＞ ＞＞          qemu_file_shutdown(f)  --＞ This will not take effect. No ?
+＞ ＞＞      }
+＞ ＞＞ }
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞ (cc'd in Daniel Berrange).
+＞ ＞ I see that we call qio_channel_set_feature(ioc, 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN) at the
+＞ ＞ top of qio_channel_socket_new  so I think that's safe isn't it?
+＞ ＞
+＞
+＞ Hmm, you are right, this problem is only exist for the migration incoming fd, 
+thanks.
+＞
+＞ ＞ Dave
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞ Thanks,
+＞ ＞＞ Hailiang
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞＞ On 2017/3/21 16:10, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ Thank you。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I have test aready。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ When the Primary Node panic,the Secondary Node qemu hang at the same 
+place。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Incorrding
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+，kill Primary Node 
+qemu will not produce the problem,but Primary Node panic can。
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I think due to the feature of channel does not support 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ when failover,channel_shutdown could not shut down the channel.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ so the colo_process_incoming_thread will hang at recvmsg.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ I test a patch:
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ diff --git a/migration/socket.c b/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ index 13966f1..d65a0ea 100644
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ --- a/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ +++ b/migration/socket.c
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ static gboolean 
+socket_accept_incoming_migration(QIOChannel *ioc,
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        }
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        trace_migration_socket_incoming_accepted()
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+"migration-socket-incoming")
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ +    qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), 
+QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        migration_channel_process_incoming(migrate_get_current(),
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞                                           QIO_CHANNEL(sioc))
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞        object_unref(OBJECT(sioc))
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ My test will not hang any more.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ 原始邮件
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ 发件人： address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 收件人：王广10165992 address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 抄送人： address@hidden address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ 日 期 ：2017年03月21日 15:58
+＞ ＞＞＞ 主 题 ：Re: [Qemu-devel]  答复: Re:  [BUG]COLO failover hang
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Hi,Wang.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ You can test this branch:
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+https://github.com/coloft/qemu/tree/colo-v5.1-developing-COLO-frame-v21-with-shared-disk
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ and please follow wiki ensure your own configuration correctly.
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ On 03/21/2017 03:27 PM, address@hidden wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ hi.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ I test the git qemu master have the same problem.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #0  qio_channel_socket_readv (ioc=0x7f65911b4e50, iov=0x7f64ef3fd880,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ niov=1, fds=0x0, nfds=0x0, errp=0x0) at io/channel-socket.c:461
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #1  0x00007f658e4aa0c2 in qio_channel_read
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (address@hidden, address@hidden "",
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden, address@hidden) at io/channel.c:114
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #2  0x00007f658e3ea990 in channel_get_buffer (opaque=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ buf=0x7f65907cb838 "", pos=＜optimized out＞, size=32768) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file-channel.c:78
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #3  0x00007f658e3e97fc in qemu_fill_buffer (f=0x7f65907cb800) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:295
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #4  0x00007f658e3ea2e1 in qemu_peek_byte (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/qemu-file.c:555
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #5  0x00007f658e3ea34b in qemu_get_byte (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:568
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #6  0x00007f658e3ea552 in qemu_get_be32 (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:648
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #7  0x00007f658e3e66e5 in colo_receive_message (f=0x7f65907cb800,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/colo.c:244
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #8  0x00007f658e3e681e in colo_receive_check_message (f=＜optimized
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ out＞, address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden)
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞     at migration/colo.c:264
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #9  0x00007f658e3e740e in colo_process_incoming_thread
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (opaque=0x7f658eb30360 ＜mis_current.31286＞) at migration/colo.c:577
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #10 0x00007f658be09df3 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #11 0x00007f65881983ed in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞name
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $2 = 0x7f658ff7d5c0 "migration-socket-incoming"
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞features        Do not support QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $3 = 0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #0  socket_accept_incoming_migration (ioc=0x7fdcceeafa90,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ condition=G_IO_IN, opaque=0x7fdcceeafa90) at migration/socket.c:137
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #1  0x00007fdcc6966350 in g_main_dispatch (context=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ gmain.c:3054
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #2  g_main_context_dispatch (context=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden) at gmain.c:3630
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #3  0x00007fdccb8a6dcc in glib_pollfds_poll () at util/main-loop.c:213
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #4  os_host_main_loop_wait (timeout=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ util/main-loop.c:258
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #5  main_loop_wait (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ util/main-loop.c:506
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #6  0x00007fdccb526187 in main_loop () at vl.c:1898
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ #7  main (argc=＜optimized out＞, argv=＜optimized out＞, envp=＜optimized
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ out＞) at vl.c:4709
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞features
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $1 = 6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ (gdb) p ioc-＞name
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ $2 = 0x7fdcce1b1ab0 "migration-socket-listener"
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ May be socket_accept_incoming_migration should
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ call qio_channel_set_feature(ioc, QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN)??
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ thank you.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ 原始邮件
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ address@hidden@huawei.com＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ *日 期 ：*2017年03月16日 14:46
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ *主 题 ：**Re: [Qemu-devel] COLO failover hang*
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ On 03/15/2017 05:06 PM, wangguang wrote:
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞   am testing QEMU COLO feature described here [QEMU
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Wiki](
+http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/COLO
+).
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ When the Primary Node panic,the Secondary Node qemu hang.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ hang at recvmsg in qio_channel_socket_readv.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ And  I run  { 'execute': 'nbd-server-stop' } and { "execute":
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ "x-colo-lost-heartbeat" } in Secondary VM's
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ monitor,the  Secondary Node qemu still hang at recvmsg .
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ I found that the colo in qemu is not complete yet.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Do the colo have any plan for development?
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Yes, We are developing. You can see some of patch we pushing.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Has anyone ever run it successfully? Any help is appreciated!
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ In our internal version can run it successfully,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ The failover detail you can ask Zhanghailiang for help.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Next time if you have some question about COLO,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ please cc me and zhanghailiang address@hidden
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ centos7.2+qemu2.7.50
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ (gdb) bt
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #0  0x00007f3e00cc86ad in recvmsg () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #1  0x00007f3e0332b738 in qio_channel_socket_readv (ioc=＜optimized 
+out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ iov=＜optimized out＞, niov=＜optimized out＞, fds=0x0, nfds=0x0, 
+errp=0x0) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ io/channel-socket.c:497
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #2  0x00007f3e03329472 in qio_channel_read (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden "", address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at io/channel.c:97
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #3  0x00007f3e032750e0 in channel_get_buffer (opaque=＜optimized out＞,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ buf=0x7f3e05910f38 "", pos=＜optimized out＞, size=32768) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file-channel.c:78
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #4  0x00007f3e0327412c in qemu_fill_buffer (f=0x7f3e05910f00) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:257
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #5  0x00007f3e03274a41 in qemu_peek_byte (address@hidden,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/qemu-file.c:510
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #6  0x00007f3e03274aab in qemu_get_byte (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:523
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #7  0x00007f3e03274cb2 in qemu_get_be32 (address@hidden) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/qemu-file.c:603
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #8  0x00007f3e03271735 in colo_receive_message (f=0x7f3e05910f00,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ address@hidden) at migration/colo.c:215
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #9  0x00007f3e0327250d in colo_wait_handle_message 
+(errp=0x7f3d62bfaa48,
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ checkpoint_request=＜synthetic pointer＞, f=＜optimized out＞) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/colo.c:546
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #10 colo_process_incoming_thread (opaque=0x7f3e067245e0) at
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ migration/colo.c:649
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #11 0x00007f3e00cc1df3 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ #12 0x00007f3dfc9c03ed in clone () from /lib64/libc..so.6
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ View this message in context:
+http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/COLO-failover-hang-tp473250.html
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞ Sent from the Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Thanks
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞ Zhang Chen
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞ ＞
+＞ ＞＞＞
+＞ ＞＞
+＞ ＞ --
+＞ ＞ Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
+＞ ＞
+＞ ＞ .
+＞ ＞
+＞
+