summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855165
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855 b/results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..574dc0c53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/105/graphic/1836855
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+assembly: 0.959
+semantic: 0.957
+graphic: 0.950
+socket: 0.945
+instruction: 0.943
+other: 0.938
+boot: 0.931
+mistranslation: 0.929
+vnc: 0.927
+device: 0.914
+KVM: 0.900
+network: 0.878
+
+virtio_scsi_ctx_check failed when detach virtio_scsi disk
+
+I found a problem  that virtio_scsi_ctx_check  failed when detaching virtio_scsi disk.  The  bt is below:
+
+(gdb) bt
+#0  0x0000ffffb02e1bd0 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+#1  0x0000ffffb02e2f7c in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+#2  0x0000ffffb02db124 in __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+#3  0x0000ffffb02db1a4 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+#4  0x00000000004eb9a8 in virtio_scsi_ctx_check (d=d@entry=0xc70d790, s=<optimized out>, s=<optimized out>)
+    at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:243
+#5  0x00000000004ec87c in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_req_prepare (s=s@entry=0xd27a7a0, req=req@entry=0xafc4b90)
+    at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:553
+#6  0x00000000004ecc20 in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_vq (s=0xd27a7a0, vq=0xd283410)
+    at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:588
+#7  0x00000000004eda20 in virtio_scsi_data_plane_handle_cmd (vdev=0x0, vq=0xffffae7a6f98)
+    at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi-dataplane.c:57
+#8  0x0000000000877254 in aio_dispatch (ctx=0xac61010) at util/aio-posix.c:323
+#9  0x00000000008773ec in aio_poll (ctx=0xac61010, blocking=true) at util/aio-posix.c:472
+#10 0x00000000005cd7cc in iothread_run (opaque=0xac5e4b0) at iothread.c:49
+#11 0x000000000087a8b8 in qemu_thread_start (args=0xac61360) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:495
+#12 0x00000000008a04e8 in thread_entry_for_hotfix (pthread_cb=0x0) at uvp/hotpatch/qemu_hotpatch_helper.c:579
+#13 0x0000ffffb041c8bc in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+#14 0x0000ffffb0382f8c in thread_start () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+
+assert(blk_get_aio_context(d->conf.blk) == s->ctx)  failed. 
+
+I think this patch (https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b) introduce this problem.
+
+commit a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b  move blockbackend back to main AioContext on unplug. It set the AioContext of 
+
+SCSIDevice  to the main AioContex, but s->ctx is still the iothread AioContext.  Is this a bug?
+
+On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 08:20:35AM -0000, 贞贵李 wrote:
+> Public bug reported:
+> 
+> I found a problem  that virtio_scsi_ctx_check  failed when detaching
+> virtio_scsi disk.  The  bt is below:
+> 
+> (gdb) bt
+> #0  0x0000ffffb02e1bd0 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> #1  0x0000ffffb02e2f7c in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> #2  0x0000ffffb02db124 in __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> #3  0x0000ffffb02db1a4 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> #4  0x00000000004eb9a8 in virtio_scsi_ctx_check (d=d@entry=0xc70d790, s=<optimized out>, s=<optimized out>)
+>     at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:243
+> #5  0x00000000004ec87c in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_req_prepare (s=s@entry=0xd27a7a0, req=req@entry=0xafc4b90)
+>     at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:553
+> #6  0x00000000004ecc20 in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_vq (s=0xd27a7a0, vq=0xd283410)
+>     at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:588
+> #7  0x00000000004eda20 in virtio_scsi_data_plane_handle_cmd (vdev=0x0, vq=0xffffae7a6f98)
+>     at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi-dataplane.c:57
+> #8  0x0000000000877254 in aio_dispatch (ctx=0xac61010) at util/aio-posix.c:323
+> #9  0x00000000008773ec in aio_poll (ctx=0xac61010, blocking=true) at util/aio-posix.c:472
+> #10 0x00000000005cd7cc in iothread_run (opaque=0xac5e4b0) at iothread.c:49
+> #11 0x000000000087a8b8 in qemu_thread_start (args=0xac61360) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:495
+> #12 0x00000000008a04e8 in thread_entry_for_hotfix (pthread_cb=0x0) at uvp/hotpatch/qemu_hotpatch_helper.c:579
+> #13 0x0000ffffb041c8bc in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+> #14 0x0000ffffb0382f8c in thread_start () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> 
+> assert(blk_get_aio_context(d->conf.blk) == s->ctx)  failed.
+> 
+> I think this patch
+> (https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b)
+> introduce this problem.
+> 
+> commit a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b  move blockbackend back
+> to main AioContext on unplug. It set the AioContext of
+> 
+> SCSIDevice  to the main AioContex, but s->ctx is still the iothread
+> AioContext.  Is this a bug?
+
+The backtrace shows that virtqueue processing is happening in the
+IOThread.  This is expected so now the question is why the
+BlockBackend's AioContext is the main AioContext.
+
+Can you share steps for reproducing this bug?
+
+Thanks!
+
+> ** Affects: qemu
+>      Importance: Undecided
+>          Status: New
+> 
+> -- 
+> You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
+> devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
+> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836855
+> 
+> Title:
+>   virtio_scsi_ctx_check failed when detach virtio_scsi disk
+> 
+> Status in QEMU:
+>   New
+> 
+> Bug description:
+>   I found a problem  that virtio_scsi_ctx_check  failed when detaching
+>   virtio_scsi disk.  The  bt is below:
+> 
+>   (gdb) bt
+>   #0  0x0000ffffb02e1bd0 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+>   #1  0x0000ffffb02e2f7c in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+>   #2  0x0000ffffb02db124 in __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+>   #3  0x0000ffffb02db1a4 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+>   #4  0x00000000004eb9a8 in virtio_scsi_ctx_check (d=d@entry=0xc70d790, s=<optimized out>, s=<optimized out>)
+>       at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:243
+>   #5  0x00000000004ec87c in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_req_prepare (s=s@entry=0xd27a7a0, req=req@entry=0xafc4b90)
+>       at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:553
+>   #6  0x00000000004ecc20 in virtio_scsi_handle_cmd_vq (s=0xd27a7a0, vq=0xd283410)
+>       at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c:588
+>   #7  0x00000000004eda20 in virtio_scsi_data_plane_handle_cmd (vdev=0x0, vq=0xffffae7a6f98)
+>       at /Images/lzg/code/710/qemu-2.8.1/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi-dataplane.c:57
+>   #8  0x0000000000877254 in aio_dispatch (ctx=0xac61010) at util/aio-posix.c:323
+>   #9  0x00000000008773ec in aio_poll (ctx=0xac61010, blocking=true) at util/aio-posix.c:472
+>   #10 0x00000000005cd7cc in iothread_run (opaque=0xac5e4b0) at iothread.c:49
+>   #11 0x000000000087a8b8 in qemu_thread_start (args=0xac61360) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:495
+>   #12 0x00000000008a04e8 in thread_entry_for_hotfix (pthread_cb=0x0) at uvp/hotpatch/qemu_hotpatch_helper.c:579
+>   #13 0x0000ffffb041c8bc in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+>   #14 0x0000ffffb0382f8c in thread_start () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+> 
+>   assert(blk_get_aio_context(d->conf.blk) == s->ctx)  failed.
+> 
+>   I think this patch
+>   (https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b)
+>   introduce this problem.
+> 
+>   commit a6f230c8d13a7ff3a0c7f1097412f44bfd9eff0b  move blockbackend
+>   back to main AioContext on unplug. It set the AioContext of
+> 
+>   SCSIDevice  to the main AioContex, but s->ctx is still the iothread
+>   AioContext.  Is this a bug?
+> 
+> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
+> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1836855/+subscriptions
+> 
+
+
+The QEMU project is currently considering to move its bug tracking to
+another system. For this we need to know which bugs are still valid
+and which could be closed already. Thus we are setting older bugs to
+"Incomplete" now.
+
+If you still think this bug report here is valid, then please switch
+the state back to "New" within the next 60 days, otherwise this report
+will be marked as "Expired". Or please mark it as "Fix Released" if
+the problem has been solved with a newer version of QEMU already.
+
+Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience.
+
+
+[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+