1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/ppc/2662 b/results/classifier/118/ppc/2662
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d5c1e9be2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/ppc/2662
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+ppc: 0.915
+architecture: 0.764
+device: 0.692
+semantic: 0.503
+graphic: 0.441
+mistranslation: 0.348
+files: 0.324
+network: 0.311
+permissions: 0.208
+user-level: 0.200
+register: 0.196
+i386: 0.189
+risc-v: 0.185
+socket: 0.173
+boot: 0.155
+peripherals: 0.151
+vnc: 0.151
+x86: 0.125
+performance: 0.123
+debug: 0.109
+kernel: 0.106
+PID: 0.090
+virtual: 0.088
+TCG: 0.073
+VMM: 0.065
+arm: 0.056
+assembly: 0.054
+hypervisor: 0.051
+KVM: 0.025
+
+powerpc: MSR_ILE bit must not be restored in rfi
+Description of problem:
+On processors that implement the MSR_ILE bit (that is, G4 and prior), the MSR_ILE bit is not restored by the `rfi` instruction.
+
+qemu, however, does restore this bit from `srr1`.
+
+Some ppcel operating systems rely on MSR_ILE not being restored by `rfi`, for example, Windows NT when taking a syscall.
+Additional information:
+Patch provided: [rfi_msr_ile.patch](/uploads/aa661fc8bcbb47585ff63f8e4ebb38ba/rfi_msr_ile.patch)
+
+The correct behaviour for G4 and prior is performed for later processors too. Given PPC970 and later have that bit documented as reserved, this should not be a problem.