1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/(graphic)/1500935 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/(graphic)/1500935
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ab0af2434
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/(graphic)/1500935
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is experiencing an issue where QEMU/KVM windows always come to the top when the mouse passes over them. This behavior is intrusive and not seen in other applications. The version mentioned is qemu-kvm 2.0.0+dfsg-2 on amd64.
+
+The user also notes that this problem was fixed in newer versions, but as of now, they're experiencing it. 
+
+First, the bug is related to window management behavior—how QEMU's windows are handled by the desktop environment. It's not a translation issue (mistranslation), nor does it pertain to assembly code or performance issues.
+
+Looking at the categories, KVM is one of them, but the issue seems more about the graphical behavior of the window rather than KVM's virtualization itself. The problem isn't with device drivers, network settings, sockets, or permissions. It's not a boot issue, VNC related, or a debug issue.
+
+The window management could fall under 'graphic' category since it relates to how the application presents its windows on the desktop. Alternatively, maybe it's part of the hypervisor's behavior, but KVM is more about virtualization than UI handling.
+
+However, the key here is that the issue is with QEMU/KVM's window always coming to the top when hovered over. This seems like a problem in how the application interacts with the desktop environment, which would be related to the graphical interface or window management.
+
+But looking at the categories again, 'graphic' might not exactly fit because it's more about window behavior rather than rendering. The hypervisor category is for KVM itself, but this issue is about the UI, so perhaps 'other' is a better fit since it doesn't neatly fall into the other specific categories like device or network.
+
+Wait, but the user mentioned that QEMU/KVM always wants to be on top. This sounds like a window management issue in the graphical environment. So maybe it's related to how QEMU interacts with the desktop's window manager. But none of the specific categories directly address window behavior except perhaps 'graphic' or 'other'.
+
+But given the options, I think 'KVM' is more appropriate because the problem occurs when using KVM under QEMU, and it's a behavior specific to that application's window management in the context of virtualization.
+
+Wait, but the issue isn't about KVM's hypervisor functionality per se, but rather the UI. Hmm. Maybe 'graphic' is better, but I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, since it's about QEMU/KVM specifically and how their windows behave, perhaps 'other' is safer because it doesn't fit neatly into the other categories.
+
+Wait, but the user says "Qemu / KVM always wants to be on top", which implies that this behavior is coming from QEMU or KVM itself, not necessarily the window manager. So maybe it's an issue within QEMU's handling of its own windows, making 'graphic' appropriate.
+
+But I'm still a bit unsure. Alternatively, perhaps 'other' because it's more about application-specific UI behavior rather than a specific category like network or kernel.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with the QEMU/KVM window always moving to the top when hovered over, which is a graphical behavior related to window management within the application itself. This doesn't fall neatly into categories like device, network, or hypervisor but is more about how the application presents its UI.
+
+**graphic**
+
+(graphic)
\ No newline at end of file