diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 | 22 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 deleted file mode 100644 index 9dad04c5a..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. So, the user provided a detailed bug report related to QEMU version 5.0.0 and a segmentation fault that occurs under specific conditions when using user emulation with cURL for aarch64 connections. - -The bug seems to be tied to a regression introduced after addressing CVE-2020-10702, which I think is a known security vulnerability in QEMU. The report mentions issues with the PAC and AUTH instructions in assembly code within libcrypto.so.1.1. Specifically, there's a problem where the stack pointer (sp) changes between the PACIASP and AUTIASP operations, leading to an authorization failure and causing a segmentation fault. - -Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, which is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode; assembly lowering, which would involve issues during the conversion of high-level code to assembly; other; device; graphic; socket; network; KVM; boot; vnc; debug; files; permissions; performance; kernel; peripherals; hypervisor. - -The bug report is about a compiler issue where certain instructions in the assembly are causing problems. The user points out that the order of operations (PACIASP followed by AUTIASP) leads to an incorrect stack pointer state, resulting in a crash. This seems related to how QEMU handles assembly code and possibly how it translates or lowers high-level code into machine-specific instructions. - -I'm thinking this might fall under 'assembly' since it's about the assembly code execution leading to a bug. However, 'mistranslation' is also a possible category because it's an issue in the mapping from source (maybe user-mode) to target architecture, causing incorrect behavior. But given that the problem seems more specific to how the assembly instructions are executed rather than the translation process itself, I might lean towards 'assembly'. - -Wait, but looking again, the issue is with the compiler generating incorrect assembly code where the order of certain instructions causes a problem in the stack pointer handling. This could be seen as an error during the lowering of high-level operations to assembly, which would fall under 'assembly' category. - -Alternatively, since it's about how the stack is being managed and leading to a segmentation fault due to improper instruction ordering, perhaps 'mistranslation' isn't the right fit because mistranslation typically refers to incorrect mapping rather than compiler-generated code issues. - -Wait no, maybe 'other' could be applicable if none of the specific categories match. But considering that it's about assembly instructions and their execution, 'assembly' seems more precise. -</think> - -The bug report discusses an issue with assembly code in libcrypto.so.1.1 where certain operations cause a segmentation fault due to incorrect stack pointer handling during PAC and AUTH instructions. This is related to the lowering or execution of assembly code within QEMU. - -**Answer:** -assembly \ No newline at end of file |