diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly')
4 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1699867 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1699867 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7a0ff35c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1699867 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed description about an issue they encountered with QEMU when using a far call into long-mode during OS development. + +First, I'll read through the problem again. They mentioned replacing 'jmp' with 'call' in their assembly code and noticed that while KVM and VMware worked fine, QEMU crashed at the far call. The log shows an error at address 10302c, which is a 'callq' instruction. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. I need to determine which one fits best. + +The issue is about QEMU crashing during a far call in 64-bit mode. Since this involves assembly code execution under QEMU's emulation, it likely points to how the emulator handles certain instructions. 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target, but here, it's more about handling the instruction itself. + +The user also mentioned that KVM and VMware work fine, implying that QEMU might have a specific bug in its translation or emulation of this particular assembly instruction. Since the crash happens at the 'callq', which is an assembly-level operation, it relates to how QEMU translates or executes assembly instructions. + +Looking into the categories, 'assembly' refers to issues in lowering (translating) code from higher levels to assembly. This seems relevant because if QEMU's translation of the far call instruction is incorrect, causing a crash, it would fall under assembly lowering errors. + +Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be considered since QEMU acts as one, but the issue is more about the handling of specific instructions rather than hypervisor functionality itself. + +So, putting it together, the bug seems to stem from how QEMU processes and translates certain assembly operations. Therefore, the most fitting category would be 'assembly'. +</think> + +The bug report involves a crash in QEMU when using a far call into long-mode during OS development. The issue arises specifically with QEMU's handling of the 'callq' instruction, which works correctly under KVM and VMware but fails in QEMU. This points to an incorrect translation or processing of assembly instructions by QEMU. Therefore, the category that best fits this bug is: + +assembly \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9dad04c5a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1880332 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. So, the user provided a detailed bug report related to QEMU version 5.0.0 and a segmentation fault that occurs under specific conditions when using user emulation with cURL for aarch64 connections. + +The bug seems to be tied to a regression introduced after addressing CVE-2020-10702, which I think is a known security vulnerability in QEMU. The report mentions issues with the PAC and AUTH instructions in assembly code within libcrypto.so.1.1. Specifically, there's a problem where the stack pointer (sp) changes between the PACIASP and AUTIASP operations, leading to an authorization failure and causing a segmentation fault. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, which is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode; assembly lowering, which would involve issues during the conversion of high-level code to assembly; other; device; graphic; socket; network; KVM; boot; vnc; debug; files; permissions; performance; kernel; peripherals; hypervisor. + +The bug report is about a compiler issue where certain instructions in the assembly are causing problems. The user points out that the order of operations (PACIASP followed by AUTIASP) leads to an incorrect stack pointer state, resulting in a crash. This seems related to how QEMU handles assembly code and possibly how it translates or lowers high-level code into machine-specific instructions. + +I'm thinking this might fall under 'assembly' since it's about the assembly code execution leading to a bug. However, 'mistranslation' is also a possible category because it's an issue in the mapping from source (maybe user-mode) to target architecture, causing incorrect behavior. But given that the problem seems more specific to how the assembly instructions are executed rather than the translation process itself, I might lean towards 'assembly'. + +Wait, but looking again, the issue is with the compiler generating incorrect assembly code where the order of certain instructions causes a problem in the stack pointer handling. This could be seen as an error during the lowering of high-level operations to assembly, which would fall under 'assembly' category. + +Alternatively, since it's about how the stack is being managed and leading to a segmentation fault due to improper instruction ordering, perhaps 'mistranslation' isn't the right fit because mistranslation typically refers to incorrect mapping rather than compiler-generated code issues. + +Wait no, maybe 'other' could be applicable if none of the specific categories match. But considering that it's about assembly instructions and their execution, 'assembly' seems more precise. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an issue with assembly code in libcrypto.so.1.1 where certain operations cause a segmentation fault due to incorrect stack pointer handling during PAC and AUTH instructions. This is related to the lowering or execution of assembly code within QEMU. + +**Answer:** +assembly \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1904210 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1904210 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..df1da3bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1904210 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report related to QEMU. The user provided some detailed logs and context, so I'll go through it step by step. + +First, the bug report mentions that a binary crashes with 'uncaught target signal SIGILL' even though it has registered a handler for SIGILL. This happens when running under QEMU's arm emulation. The user provided logs from two different QEMU versions (2.5.0 and 2.11.1) showing how the program behaves. + +Looking at the logs, in version 2.5.0, after some system calls, the binary reads input and then writes "wrong!" to stdout, leading to an illegal seek error and exit. In 2.11.1, similar steps happen, but after reading 'flag{', it triggers SIGILL signals, causing QEMU to crash because the handler isn't invoked again. + +The user suspects that the binary relies on older signal handling in QEMU which doesn't work correctly anymore. They mention that the binary uses an illegal instruction "udf 1", which causes a SIGTRAP on real hardware but is handled as SIGILL in QEMU. The issue seems to be related to how QEMU emulates signals, particularly SIGILL. + +The user also points out that Peter's patch was included to handle such cases correctly by delivering SIGTRAP instead of SIGILL for illegal instructions like "udf 1". They concluded that the binary doesn't run on real hardware either and suggests any remaining issues are with the binary itself, not QEMU. + +So, focusing on the problem: it's about how signals (specifically SIGILL) are handled when running a guest program under QEMU. The bug arises from incorrect signal emulation leading to unhandled signals and crashes. This falls under the category of handling exceptions or signals correctly in the emulator. + +Looking at the possible categories provided, 'signal(SIGILL)' is directly related to how signals are managed in the user-mode assembly or the target's signal handling. Since this involves assembly-level operations (like illegal instructions) and their corresponding signal responses, it fits under 'assembly' category. +</think> + +The bug report discusses issues with QEMU's handling of SIGILL signals when running a binary that executes an illegal instruction ("udf 1"). The problem arises because the binary relies on older signal handling behavior in QEMU which doesn't work correctly in newer versions. This is related to how signals are emulated, particularly for illegal instructions, which falls under the 'assembly' category as it involves low-level instruction handling and exception management. + +**Answer:** assembly \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1909823 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1909823 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..508319c41 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/assembly/1909823 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to classify the given bug report from QEMU. Let's break it down step by step. + +The bug title is "RDPMC check on PCE is backwards." The user mentions that at a specific line in the code (target/i386/tcg/misc_helper.c#L225), there's an issue with the CR4_PCE_MASK check being backwards. It raises an exception when the flag is set instead of when it's clear. + +The description explains that this is a low-priority bug because the instruction isn't implemented yet, leading to an incorrect exception type. However, it could cause problems if the instruction is ever implemented in the future. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug seems to be related to how certain flags are handled in the code. Specifically, it's about the condition check for CR4_PCE_MASK being reversed. This sounds like an issue with the translation or handling of instructions at the assembly level or during the lowering process from higher-level IR to target-specific code. + +CR4 and other control registers are part of the CPU's state, so this might relate to how QEMU emulates the x86 architecture. Since it's about checking a specific flag and raising exceptions correctly, it's likely an issue in the assembly translation or lowering phase. + +The possible categories include 'assembly' which fits because the bug is in the code that handles assembly instructions (specifically RDPMC). The incorrect check might be part of the assembly-level helper functions. + +Other categories like 'kernel', 'hypervisor', or 'peripherals' don't seem to fit as well here since this isn't about system calls, virtualization management, or hardware peripherals. It's more about how QEMU translates and executes x86 instructions. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug is 'assembly'. +</think> + +The issue relates to an incorrect condition in handling a CPU flag during instruction processing, which affects how exceptions are raised. This falls under the assembly-related code as it pertains to translating or executing specific instructions. + +**Answer:** + +assembly \ No newline at end of file |