diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug')
6 files changed, 0 insertions, 130 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920 deleted file mode 100644 index c609a699b..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1031920 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed report about an issue with the Linux user gdbserver in QEMU not responding to remote Ctrl-C interrupts. They also mentioned that they're working on a fix involving adding a new thread to handle communication after resuming the process. - -First, I'll read through the bug description carefully. The main problem is that when using GDB to debug a program running under QEMU, pressing Ctrl-C (which sends an interrupt) doesn't stop the program. Instead, it just gives up and stops debugging. This suggests that the communication between GDB and QEMU's gdbserver isn't working as expected after resuming execution. - -The user explains that once the process is resumed with "cont", the gdbstub in QEMU no longer reads the communication channel. So, any incoming interrupts from GDB are ignored because the server isn't listening anymore. They're planning to fix this by introducing an additional thread that will wake up when the process resumes and then monitor the communication channel for Ctrl-C requests. - -Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other. - -The issue here is related to how GDB communicates with QEMU's gdbserver. Since it's about the interaction between GDB and QEMU's debugging stub, this seems to fall under the "debug" category. The problem isn't in translation from source architecture or assembly lowering but rather in the communication handling during debugging sessions. - -I also note that the user mentioned another related issue with multithreaded breakpoints not suspending all threads, which further points towards a debugging environment problem, reinforcing that "debug" is the appropriate category. - -Therefore, I classify this bug report under the "debug" category. -</think> - -debug \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1528718 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1528718 deleted file mode 100644 index 7b95e6d24..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1528718 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's go through the details step by step. - -The user reports that when running QEMU on Windows using the MSYS2 binary, the initial monitor doesn't output anything. Specifically, error messages before the UI starts aren't showing up. For example, when they try to use a large RAM size, QEMU should display "ram size too large," but nothing appears in the console. - -They mention that vfprintf is called but there's no output. This issue affects both "qemu-system-i386.exe" and "qemu-system-i386w.exe." They also provided some dumpbin outputs showing that these are 64-bit executables with a subsystem version indicating they're Win32 applications. - -The user then asks if this problem still exists in the latest QEMU versions or if it can be closed. After retesting, they found that the issue is fixed in the latest MSYS2 version. - -So, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. The bug seems to be related to how error messages are handled in Windows, specifically with output not appearing as expected. - -I'm considering if it's a translation issue (mistranslation) or something else. Since the problem is about output not being displayed, it might relate to how logging or error reporting works on Windows. It could be an issue with how QEMU handles stdout or stderr in Windows environments, possibly due to how the console is initialized or if certain functions aren't properly outputting text. - -The fact that vfprintf is called but nothing shows suggests a problem with the output mechanism itself. This might not be related to assembly lowering or translation from source architecture but rather an issue with error reporting and logging in the Windows environment. So, looking at the categories again, none of the specific ones like network or device seem to fit. - -"debug" could be relevant because it's about error messages not being displayed, which relates to debugging output. Alternatively, "other" might apply if it doesn't fit into any other category. However, since it's specifically about output handling during startup and errors, "debug" seems more appropriate as the category. -</think> - -debug \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1828723 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1828723 deleted file mode 100644 index e3500f22b..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1828723 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is talking about QEMU and mentions a feature request for an option to suppress gemu_log() output. They're using QEMU in user-mode emulation, which suggests it's part of the user-mode translation or maybe related to logging. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to see which one fits best. - -The issue is about log messages being emitted unconditionally. The user wants an option to suppress these logs, similar to existing options like -D or -d. This seems related to debugging output. So the bug is about logging behavior in QEMU. - -In QEMU, the logging system allows controlling what information is printed. If gemu_log() is part of that logging mechanism, then this issue is about adjusting debug options. However, the categories don't have a 'logging' option, so I might need to map it elsewhere. - -The user mentioned using binfmt for chroots or containers, which relates to how QEMU handles different architectures in user mode. They also provided a link discussing log handling, suggesting it's part of the general logging features rather than any specific component like network or graphics. - -Looking at possible categories, 'debug' seems closest because it's about controlling debug output. Alternatively, maybe 'other' if none of the other categories fit better. But since debug specifically relates to log messages and verbosity levels, I think that's a more accurate category. -</think> - -The bug report is about the suppression of logging messages in QEMU's user-mode emulation. Since it deals with controlling debug output, the most appropriate category is 'debug'. - -**Answer:** - -debug \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1877136 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1877136 deleted file mode 100644 index 9f4152a95..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1877136 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -Looking at the problem description, it's about GDB making mistakes when debugging an armv7-m binary on QEMU. The issue is that GDB thinks the target isn't M-profile because of incorrect feature reporting. - -The user mentioned that the problem arises from QEMU using `arm-core.xml` unconditionally for CPU cores. This XML file provides the 'org.gnu.gdb.arm.core' feature, which isn't correct for M-profile targets like Cortex-M3. Instead, it should use 'org.gnu.gdb.arm.m-profile'. - -They provided a link to GDB's documentation, where it specifies that M-profile targets should have the latter feature. So QEMU is incorrectly setting up the features, leading GDB to mishandle certain aspects, such as backtraces over signal handlers. - -The bug report also includes reproduction steps and mentions a patch was submitted. The fix was applied in QEMU's master branch for version 5.1. - -Now, considering the categories: - -- **mistranslation**: This usually refers to incorrect mapping from source to IR or target, often seen in user-mode issues. While there's an issue with features affecting GDB behavior, it doesn't directly relate to translation between architectures. - -- **assembly lowering**: This involves converting high-level code to assembly. The problem here is more about feature reporting rather than assembly generation. - -- **other**: Could be a possibility if the bug doesn't fit into specific categories. - -Other options like device, graphic, etc., don't seem relevant because the issue is with GDB's interaction and feature detection for ARM cores in QEMU. - -The key issue is that QEMU isn't providing the correct GDB features, leading to GDB not recognizing the M-profile. This is a problem in how QEMU configures or reports the target architecture for debugging purposes. - -So, the most appropriate category seems to be **debug**, as it directly affects GDB's ability to correctly debug the target and relates to feature reporting necessary for proper debugging functionality. -</think> - -The bug report describes an issue where QEMU incorrectly provides feature information to GDB, causing GDB to misbehave when debugging M-profile ARM targets. The problem lies in how QEMU sets up the features for GDB, leading to incorrect handling of certain debug scenarios. - -**Step-by-step Explanation:** - -1. **Issue Identification**: The bug affects GDB's ability to recognize the target as an M-profile ARM core because QEMU reports the wrong feature (`org.gnu.gdb.arm.core` instead of `org.gnu.gdb.arm.m-profile`). - -2. **Root Cause**: QEMU unconditionally uses `arm-core.xml`, which doesn't specify the correct feature for M-profile targets. - -3. **Impact**: This causes GDB to mishandle debug operations like backtraces, as it fails to recognize the target's architecture correctly. - -4. **Category Fit**: The bug is related to how QEMU configures debugging features, affecting GDB's interaction with the target. Since it directly impacts the debugging process and feature detection, it falls under the **debug** category. - -Answer: debug \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1907210 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1907210 deleted file mode 100644 index e240f4192..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1907210 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed description of an issue they're encountering with QEMU's gdbstub. They mentioned that when using a third-party GDB client and sending the "?" command, all breakpoints get removed by QEMU. This behavior isn't expected because, according to the official GDB documentation, the "?" command should only return the stop reason, not modify the state like removing breakpoints. - -The user also included some code context from gdbstub.c where there's a comment indicating that the developer intended to remove breakpoints during initial connection since they assumed most clients only use "?" at that point. However, the user argues that this approach is incorrect and suggests that initial connection should be detected differently rather than using the "?" command. - -Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The issue revolves around how QEMU's gdbstub handles a specific GDB command, which affects breakpoints during debugging sessions. This seems to be related to the debugging functionality of QEMU. The category "debug" fits best because it pertains to the interaction with the debugger and how breakpoints are managed. -</think> - -debug \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1917661 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1917661 deleted file mode 100644 index 958816d64..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/debug/1917661 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user is talking about an issue where certain registers in RISC-V64 aren't being assigned to the correct groups when using GDB with QEMU. They mention that these registers should belong to 'all', 'system', and 'csr' groups but are instead only part of the 'general' group. - -First, I need to understand what's happening here. It sounds like a problem with how QEMU is handling register groups for RISC-V when debugging using GDB. The user provided steps to reproduce: running QEMU in GDB mode, attaching GDB, setting a breakpoint, and then printing the register groups. They noticed that some registers are not in the expected groups. - -The possible categories given include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc. Let me think about each one. - -Mistranslation usually refers to incorrect mapping from the source architecture to the target or IR, which could happen in user-mode. But this seems more related to how QEMU's GDB interface is handling registers, not necessarily a translation issue between architectures. - -Assembly lowering would be about converting higher-level code into assembly, but again, this doesn't seem directly related since it's about register group definitions, not the code being translated. - -Looking at other categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The bug is more about debugging with GDB and how registers are categorized, so perhaps 'debug' or maybe 'boot' if it affects startup. - -Wait, but the issue is specifically with register groups in GDB when using QEMU. That sounds like a problem related to the debugging interface itself. So I'm leaning towards 'debug'. - -Alternatively, could it be 'mistranslation'? Maybe not, because mistranslation typically relates to how code is converted, not how debug information is presented. - -So the categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The issue here is that certain registers are assigned to incorrect groups when using GDB. This affects the debugging process because if registers are in wrong groups, GDB might not handle them properly or could cause confusion. - -I think 'debug' is the most appropriate category here because it directly relates to how QEMU handles debug information and register groups for the debugger. -</think> - -debug \ No newline at end of file |