diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1577841')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1577841 | 23 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1577841 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1577841 deleted file mode 100644 index 62389476b..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/mistranslation/1577841 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a code snippet and some context about the issue. - -First, I see that it's part of QEMU, specifically in target-mips/helper.c at line 542. The problem is with a warning from GCC about using memset incorrectly. The original code uses sizeof(*env->CP0_WatchLo), which might not be correctly calculating the size needed for memset. - -The bug report mentions that the fix was to change it to 8 * sizeof(target_ulong). So, this seems like an issue with how memory is being handled in the code. - -Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -I need to figure out which category fits best. The issue is with a function call (memset) and the size argument. This doesn't seem related directly to any of the device, graphic, or network categories. It's more about how data is being handled in memory, but not specifically assembly lowering either because it's more about type handling. - -Wait, maybe it's related to memory management or data types. However, the categories don't have a 'memory' option. The closest might be mistranslation, which refers to incorrect mappings from source architecture to IR/target. But this is in user-mode and involves the compiler warning about the size calculation, so it's more of an issue with how the code uses memset correctly. - -Alternatively, since it's about the sizeof operator and data alignment, perhaps 'other' might be appropriate if none of the other categories fit better. - -But considering that this is a specific coding issue related to using sizeof in a way that caused a compiler warning, I think 'mistranslation' might not be the best fit because mistranslation usually refers to incorrect semantic mappings during translation. This seems more like a code style or correctness issue rather than a translation error. - -Looking again, perhaps 'assembly lowering' isn't right either because this is in C code, not assembly. The bug report doesn't mention any changes in assembly; it's about function usage. - -So, if I have to choose between the given categories, maybe 'other' is the safest bet since none of the specific categories like device or network apply here. -</think> - -mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |