summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1308381
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1308381')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/130838119
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1308381 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1308381
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bdc3a11f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/1308381
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided some details about encountering illegal instructions when running their test case. Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, the problem is with AArch64 ARMv8 code using specific intrinsics: vqmovunh_s16, vqmovuns_s32, and vqmovund_s64. These get translated into SQXTUN instructions, which seem to be causing issues because QEMU isn't handling them correctly.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, I see options like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The bug is related to instruction handling in a specific architecture (AArch64), so it's likely tied to how QEMU handles these instructions.
+
+The user mentioned that the test case uses GCC and Clang, compiling into these SQXTUN instructions which result in illegal instruction errors. This suggests that either the instructions aren't being translated properly or they're not supported by QEMU at all.
+
+Since this is about incorrect handling of specific machine instructions during compilation or translation, it could be a mistranslation issue. Alternatively, if QEMU doesn't support these instructions natively and there's no proper emulation, it might fall under 'other' since it's an instruction-related problem but not fitting into the more specific categories like network or graphics.
+
+However, considering that the issue is about translating user-mode assembly to IR or target code, which isn't working correctly, the category 'mistranslation' seems appropriate. It indicates a problem in how source instructions are mapped to the target architecture's instructions.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where specific AArch64 ARMv8 intrinsics (vqmovunh_s16, vqmovuns_s32, vqmovund_s64) are translated into SQXTUN instructions that QEMU does not handle correctly, resulting in illegal instruction errors. This indicates a problem with how the source code is being translated or lowered to the target architecture's assembly instructions, which falls under the category of 'mistranslation'.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+The bug report should be classified as **mistranslation** because it involves incorrect handling of specific machine instructions during translation from user-mode assembly.
\ No newline at end of file