diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1907210')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1907210 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1907210 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1907210 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..513af6542 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1907210 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue with the gdbstub in QEMU. Specifically, when they send a "?" command from their third-party GDB client, QEMU removes all breakpoints. They mention that this behavior isn't expected because "?" should only return the stop reason, not modify the state by removing breakpoints. + +Looking at the provided information, it seems that in the function handling the "?" command, there's a comment indicating that the developer intended to remove breakpoints during initial connection. The assumption was that since popular GDB clients only use "?" at the start, it's safe. However, the user argues that detecting initial connect should be done differently and not tied to the "?" command. + +Now, considering the categories: mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping from source to target, which doesn't seem to fit here. The bug is in how QEMU handles a GDB command, so it's more about the protocol implementation rather than assembly or translation issues. + +Looking at other options like 'debug' since gdbstub is part of debugging functionality. Alternatively, 'other' could be a possibility if none of the specific categories apply. But since this directly relates to how QEMU interacts with debug clients, 'debug' seems appropriate. +</think> + +The bug report deals with an unexpected behavior in QEMU's gdbstub when handling the "?" command, which affects breakpoints and is related to debugging functionality. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** +1. The issue occurs within QEMU's gdbstub, which handles communication between GDB clients and the target being debugged. +2. The problem arises because the "?" command triggers the removal of all breakpoints, contrary to expected behavior. +3. This relates to how QEMU processes debug commands and maintains state during debugging sessions. + +**Answer:** +debug \ No newline at end of file |