1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1089006 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1089006
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..210655d61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1089006
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the problem again.
+
+The user reports that when using libvirt on a host with 12 eth interfaces (4 VF and 8 bridged), the order in which these interfaces appear inside the VM is scrambled. The issue isn't just random; specific subsets (like eth8-eth11) come up in the expected bus order, while others don't.
+
+The user mentioned that regardless of the XML configuration order, QEMU presents them as eth0 to eth11, but not in the intended sequence. The MAC addresses are random, which probably isn't the issue here since MACs shouldn't affect ordering based on the problem description.
+
+From what I know, QEMU is responsible for presenting devices to the VM, and libvirt configures these devices. If libvirt correctly passes the order but QEMU scrambles them, it points towards an issue within QEMU's device handling. The user also referenced a libvirt developer saying they present in bus order, which suggests that the problem lies with QEMU not maintaining that order.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, "device" seems appropriate because it relates to how devices are presented or handled by QEMU. Other categories like "network" could be considered since it's about network interfaces, but the broader issue is with device ordering, not just networking. Therefore, the most accurate category here would be "device".
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the order of eth devices in a VM is scrambled. Since this relates to how QEMU presents devices and their order, the appropriate category is:
+
+**device**
+
+Answer: device
\ No newline at end of file