diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/1168733')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/1168733 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/1168733 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/1168733 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..56d429198 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/1168733 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug report is about reserved identifier violations in QEMU. Let me think through this step by step. + +First, looking at the issue described: the user points out that certain identifiers like __COMMAND_H__ and _QEMU_OPTIONS_H_ don't follow the expected naming conventions of the C language standard. They mention header guards as an example and reference CERT coding guidelines regarding reserved identifiers. + +Now, checking the possible categories: there's 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'other', 'device', 'graphic', 'socket', 'network', 'KVM', 'boot', 'vnc', 'debug', 'files', 'permissions', 'performance', 'kernel', 'peripherals', 'hypervisor'. + +The bug is related to the naming of identifiers in C code, specifically in header files. This doesn't seem to fall under any of the more specific categories like network or graphics because it's about code style and standards compliance rather than functionality. + +'Mistranslation' usually refers to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which isn't the case here. 'Other' seems too broad, but maybe it's appropriate since this is a coding standard issue that doesn't fit into the other categories like device or kernel. + +Wait, another thought: does this relate to the kernel? Since QEMU can interact with the kernel, but in this case, it's about C code style. So probably not 'kernel'. + +Looking back, the issue is purely about coding standards and identifier naming, which doesn't directly tie into any of the specific functional areas like networking or VNC. Therefore, the most fitting category would be 'other' because it's a general coding practice violation without affecting a specific component. +</think> + +The bug report discusses issues with reserved identifiers in C code, specifically in header files. This relates to coding standards and naming conventions rather than any specific functionality within QEMU. + +**category** + +Other \ No newline at end of file |