1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2025586 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2025586
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a192b129a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2025586
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The issue is about aligning the iov length to the logical block size. The problem arises when the virtual block device's logical block size is smaller than the host's block size. This causes QEMU to use unaligned buffers during direct IO, leading to incorrect buffer handling. 
+
+In the past, the alignment was based on memory page offsets, but a kernel commit fixed this by separating memory alignment from logical block size. Now, QEMU has an incorrect understanding of the minimum vector size.
+
+The fix provided is in an upstream commit which adjusts how iov lengths are aligned using the request length instead of memory offsets. The test plan involves setting up a loop device and running QEMU with certain parameters.
+
+Looking at the categories, options include 'device', 'network', 'KVM', etc. This issue seems related to block I/O handling within QEMU's block layer. Since it deals with how data is aligned when accessing block devices, especially in direct IO contexts, it falls under the block device management. 
+
+'Block' isn't listed as a category here, but considering the available options, 'device' seems appropriate because it pertains to the interaction between QEMU and block devices. Alternatively, if there's a more specific category like 'files' or 'peripherals', I might reconsider. However, given the categories provided, 'device' is the closest fit as it relates to how virtual devices are handled in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+block
\ No newline at end of file