diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1095531')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1095531 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1095531 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1095531 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b59565541 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1095531 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided some code snippets and error logs related to a problem in SPARC 32plus on 64-bit hosts. + +Looking at the issue description, it seems like there are errors in the load and store functions when compiling on 64-bit systems. Specifically, the call to gen_address_mask() is causing incorrect assembly generation, leading to access violations. The user also noticed that this doesn't happen when debugging QEMU in powerpc mode, so it's specific to SPARC32plus. + +In the code snippets provided, there are lines like "mov %ebx,%ebx" which seem redundant and might be causing issues with the generated x86 instructions. These lines appear in both examples, suggesting a pattern. The problem occurs during translation of SPARC instructions to x86, especially when handling 32-bit operations on a 64-bit host. + +The user attempted to disable gen_address_mask(), but that didn't fix the issue and made things worse. So, it's not just about whether address masking is applied, but rather how the code generation handles 32-bit vs. 64-bit addresses. + +I'm considering the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, or other. Since the problem is in the translation process (from SPARC to x86), and specifically in how certain operations are being handled in terms of addressing, this seems related to the semantic mapping from source to target architecture. So it's a mistranslation issue. + +Additionally, looking at the generated code, there's an unnecessary "mov" instruction that could be causing issues with the registers, especially since on 64-bit systems, using 32-bit registers might not behave as expected without proper handling. + +So putting it all together, the category is likely 'mistranslation' because it's about incorrect mapping during translation leading to assembly errors. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue with the code generation for SPARC instructions on a 64-bit host, specifically in functions related to loading and storing. The problem arises from improper handling of address masks and results in incorrect x86 assembly instructions, such as redundant 'mov' operations that cause access violations. This is classified under 'mistranslation' because it involves errors in the semantic mapping during translation from SPARC to x86. + +**Answer: mistranslation** \ No newline at end of file |