diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1129571')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1129571 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1129571 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1129571 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..47969d28b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1129571 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about LibreOffice FTBFS (Fail To Build From Source) on armhf using QEMU. Let me break it down step by step. + +First, the user mentioned that LibreOffice 3.5.7 is failing to build on armhf in Launchpad buildds and they suspect QEMU as the cause. They provided a snippet from the build log where an error occurs during the execution of some Java tools related to building help files for LibreOffice's writer module. + +The error code mentioned is 132, which according to the user, corresponds to bash error code 128 + 4. Error code 4 typically means an illegal instruction was executed. So, in this case, something triggered an illegal instruction during the build process, and they think QEMU might be to blame. + +Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. The user is suggesting that the issue is within QEMU, which is a hypervisor and emulator. + +The error seems to occur during the build process on an armhf machine emulated by QEMU. Since it's related to executing instructions that might not be correctly translated for the target architecture (armhf), I'm leaning towards 'mistranslation'. Alternatively, if the issue is within how QEMU handles device emulation or other hypervisor functionalities, it could fall under 'hypervisor' or maybe even 'kernel'. + +But since the error code suggests an illegal instruction during execution, which often points to issues in translating instructions from the host architecture (x86) to the target (armhf), the most fitting category seems to be 'mistranslation'. That would imply that QEMU is incorrectly mapping some aspect of the source code's semantics when running on armhf. + +Another angle: if the problem was with assembly lowering, which is part of the compilation process in QEMU, maybe it could also fit. But the error occurs during execution, not during compilation, so 'mistranslation' still seems more accurate as it relates to how instructions are being handled at runtime. +</think> + +The bug report suggests an issue related to incorrect instruction translation when running on armhf under QEMU, leading to an illegal instruction error. This points to a problem in the translation layer rather than assembly generation or hypervisor-level issues. + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |