1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1793791 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1793791
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..285d8fc63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1793791
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user reported a crash with "nbd_reply_chunk_iter_receive: Assertion `chunk->flags & NBD_REPLY_FLAG_DONE' failed". They're using QEMU version 2.12.1 on both hosts, which are Linux systems with versions 4.9.76 and 4.14.67.
+
+They were performing a live migration using virsh migrate from Host A to Host B. The command includes several options like --live, --undefinesource, etc., and it resulted in a crash during the process.
+
+Looking at the error message: It's an assertion failure in block/nbd-client.c at line 606. The specific issue is that the chunk->flags doesn't have the NBD_REPLY_FLAG_DONE set when it was expected to be there.
+
+Now, I need to figure out which category this falls under. Let me look at the possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+NBD stands for Network Block Device, so it's related to network storage over a network. The error is happening in the NBD client code during a migration, which involves networking between two QEMU instances on different hosts.
+
+Since NBD is part of the network block layer and this crash occurs during a migration, which uses network communication between the source and destination QEMU processes, it's likely related to how the network is handled in QEMU. Therefore, the most appropriate category would be 'network'.
+</think>
+
+network
\ No newline at end of file