diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1897194')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1897194 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1897194 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1897194 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04d67edad --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1897194 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a test failure in `test-crypto-secret.c` where an assertion failed because the key was less than 0. They mentioned that building with `--disable-keyring` fixed it for version 5.1.0 but no longer works after a specific commit. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The test is related to crypto secrets, which involves cryptographic key management. The error seems to be about a failed assertion regarding the key value. Since it's in the crypto area and the issue arises after a commit that likely modified how the keyring interacts with QEMU, it probably relates to device or kernel functions. However, since `test-crypto-secret` is part of QEMU's testing suite, which deals with cryptographic operations and might interact with hardware devices or the host's key management system. + +The error message indicates an issue with the key not being as expected. If this happens when using the keyring, it could be a problem in how the keyring backend (possibly something like libgcrypt or another library) is integrated into QEMU. Since QEMU uses keyrings for secure secret storage, and if that's failing after a change, it might be related to device or kernel-level interactions. + +Alternatively, since cryptographic functions are part of the device emulation or hypervisor security features, maybe it's under the 'other' category because it's more about a specific test case failure rather than a core component like networking or KVM. + +But considering that it's about key management and crypto, which is more on the device or kernel side, perhaps 'device' is the right category. However, if it's related to how QEMU interacts with the host's keyring (which might be part of the system calls), maybe it falls under 'other'. + +Wait, looking at the possible categories again, there isn't a specific crypto category. The closest might be 'device' since it involves cryptographic keys and device drivers or services that handle such operations. Alternatively, 'kernel' if it's related to how QEMU interacts with the host kernel's key management. + +But I'm not entirely sure. Since the test is about secrets and keys, which are more on the security side, perhaps 'other' is the safest bet because it doesn't fit neatly into other categories like network or devices. +</think> + +The bug report involves a test failure related to cryptographic secret handling in QEMU, specifically an assertion failure when interacting with the keyring. The issue arises after a commit that modifies the keyring behavior. Since this pertains to cryptographic functions and the key management system within QEMU, which doesn't fit neatly into other categories like network or devices but is more about security aspects. + +**other** \ No newline at end of file |