diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1918975')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1918975 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1918975 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1918975 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bb82eae5d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1918975 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The title says it's a feature request about propagating the interpreter to spawned processes in QEMU user mode, possibly using an option like -R recursive. The user wants that if their program is being interpreted by QEMU static, any processes it spawns should also be handled by QEMU. + +Looking at the list of categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +This feature request is about how QEMU handles processes that a user program spawns. It's not directly related to the translation of instructions (mistranslation) or assembly lowering. It also doesn't fit into categories like network, graphic, or socket since those are specific functionalities. + +I think this might fall under 'other' because it's a general feature request about process handling rather than a specific component. Alternatively, maybe 'boot' if it relates to how processes start, but I'm not sure. It could also be 'kernel' if it's related to system calls or process management in the hypervisor context. + +Wait, considering that QEMU as a hypervisor runs user-mode processes, this request is about ensuring spawned processes are also interpreted by QEMU. So it's more of a runtime feature rather than a specific component like network or graphic. Maybe 'other' is the safest bet because it doesn't neatly fit into any other category provided. + +Alternatively, could it be under 'hypervisor'? Since hypervisors manage virtual machines and process isolation. But this seems more about how user processes are handled, so perhaps not directly hypervisor-related. + +I think 'other' is the most appropriate here. +</think> + +The feature request pertains to ensuring that spawned processes by a QEMU-interpreted program are also managed by QEMU, which doesn't fit into specific categories like device or network. It's more about process management in general, making 'other' the suitable category. + +**Answer:** other \ No newline at end of file |