diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/2162')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/2162 | 24 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/2162 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/2162 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..778c5ec01 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/2162 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Some subtests have over-optimistic timeouts and time out on the s390 runner." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, I'll read the bug report carefully. It mentions subtests having timeouts that are too optimistic, causing them to time out on the s390 runner. So the issue is about test failures due to timeout settings not being suitable for s390x execution environment. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation and assembly relate more to code conversion or optimization issues. +- Device, graphic, socket, network are hardware-related but this doesn't seem related directly. +- KVM is a hypervisor, which might be involved if s390 uses it, but the bug isn't about virtualization itself. +- Boot relates to system startup; maybe relevant if tests involve booting, but not necessarily. +- VNC and debug are more specific interfaces or debugging tools, which don't seem applicable here. +- Files, permissions: not related to file handling issues. +- Performance could be a possibility because timeouts relate to how quickly tasks complete. If the timeout is too short for s390, it's about performance expectations in testing. +- Kernel, peripherals, hypervisor might also be considered, but they don't directly address the test setup issue. + +The problem is that the subtests' timeouts are set too low for the s390 environment, leading to failures. This isn't a translation error or a hardware device issue. It's more about how tests are configured and their expected execution times. Therefore, it relates to performance in testing rather than code optimization or hardware. + +So, the category should be 'performance'. +</think> + +The bug report discusses test timeouts that are too short for the s390 runner. This isn't a problem with translation or assembly but rather an issue with how tests are configured regarding their execution time. Therefore, it falls under performance-related issues in testing. + +Answer: performance \ No newline at end of file |