1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/862 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/862
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4a5c1449d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/862
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from the qemu project into one of the given categories. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+Looking at the problem description, the user is reporting that using QEMU with KVM (qemu+kvm) is slower than just using QEMU without KVM on their RV6 project. They provided steps to reproduce and some benchmark results showing significant performance degradation when KVM is enabled.
+
+The key here is that the issue revolves around the use of KVM, which stands for Kernel Virtual Machine. It's a hypervisor that allows running multiple virtual machines on a single physical machine at near-native performance levels by passing through hardware instructions directly to the guest OS. So any issue related to KVM performance would fall under the 'KVM' category.
+
+They tried changing various QEMU parameters and even tested with other benchmarks, but still saw poor performance when using KVM. This suggests that the problem is indeed with how KVM is being utilized or configured in their setup. 
+
+Other possible categories like 'performance' could also apply since they're talking about speed issues, but the root cause seems to be tied directly to the use of KVM as a hypervisor. Therefore, classifying this under 'KVM' makes the most sense.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses performance issues specifically when using QEMU with KVM enabled. Since the problem is related to the use and configuration of KVM, which is a hypervisor component, the appropriate category is:
+
+**KVM**
\ No newline at end of file