diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/debug/1241')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/debug/1241 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/debug/1241 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/debug/1241 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6c0749b89 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/debug/1241 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem again. + +The user is having trouble with the GDB debugger when using QEMU. Specifically, after updating QEMU, certain commands like "info r mip" are failing. They mention that in previous versions, they could print all CSRs (Control and Status Registers), but now only a few like fcsr, frm, and fflags show up. When they try to use "info r mip", GDB says the register 'mip' is invalid. + +First, I need to understand what's going on here. The user is working with RISC-V architecture since the mention of CSRs like mideleg and mhartid are specific to RISC-V. So it's likely a problem related to how QEMU handles these registers when debugging. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to pick the right one. + +The issue seems to be with GDB's ability to recognize certain registers after an update in QEMU. This suggests that the problem might be in how QEMU communicates or provides register information to the debugger. Since the user was able to do this before but can't now, it points towards a regression in QEMU's handling of these registers. + +Now, which category fits best? 'debug' seems appropriate because GDB is part of the debugging process, and the issue is that certain registers aren't being recognized correctly during debugging sessions. Alternatively, 'hypervisor' or 'kernel' might come into play if it's related to how QEMU emulates the hardware, but since this is specifically a debugger interaction, 'debug' seems more precise. + +I think 'debug' is the most fitting category here because the bug affects the interaction with the debugger (GDB) when trying to access specific registers. It doesn't seem to be an issue with translation from source to target architecture or assembly lowering; it's more about how QEMU presents register information to GDB. +</think> + +debug \ No newline at end of file |