diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1749223')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1749223 | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1749223 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1749223 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1c8b7cbdd --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1749223 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's look at the details provided. + +The user is experiencing an issue where the mouse cursor hits an "invisible wall" when moving in or out of the VM, especially when grabbing the mouse with alt-grab enabled. This problem has been occurring since version 2.10 at least and persists in 2.11.0-3. The behavior seems to affect the vertical movement downward. + +First, I should consider what each category means: + +- Mistranslation: Incorrect mapping from source to target architecture or IR. +- Assembly lowering: Issues during assembly code generation. +- Other: Any bug that doesn't fit other categories. +- Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to mouse movement in the VM. Mouse handling usually falls under input devices and could be related to how QEMU emulates or handles USB devices since the user has USB devices specified in their configuration (-usb --usbdevice host:0000:ffff). + +Looking at the command line, they're using -usb twice, which might not be necessary but doesn't directly cause this issue. They also have a vfio-pci device for 00:00.0, which is likely GPU-related. + +The problem seems to affect mouse movement specifically when alt-grab is used. Alt-grab is part of the QEMU's grab feature for the cursor. If there's an invisible wall, it might be due to incorrect handling of the mouse coordinates or events in the guest OS compared to the host. + +Considering the categories, "device" could cover input devices like the mouse, but perhaps more specific would be "graphic" since mouse movement is tied to the display and windowing system. Alternatively, if it's related to how QEMU handles the USB device (the mouse), then "device" might be better. + +Wait, in this case, the mouse is a peripheral device handled by QEMU as an input device. The issue arises when using alt-grab, which is part of the display handling. But the problem occurs with the mouse movement boundaries, which could relate to how the cursor is managed within the VM's window or display. + +Alternatively, maybe it's related to graphics drivers or how the guest OS handles the cursor position. If QEMU isn't correctly translating mouse events, that could be a translation issue. However, "mistranslation" usually refers to architecture mapping, not device input handling. + +Another angle is whether this affects the host or guest. Since the user is moving the mouse within the VM window, it's more about how QEMU manages the cursor in the graphical display, possibly under the VNC or SPICE display drivers. But the report doesn't mention using VNC; they're using -vga vmware. + +Wait, the bug occurs when using alt-grab, which is a QEMU feature to grab the mouse for the VM. The issue might be in how the cursor movement is handled when transitioning between grabbed and non-grabbed states or within the VM window. + +Given that, it's likely related to the graphical display handling or the mouse device configuration. Since the user has "vfio-pci" for a device (probably GPU), but the mouse is another device. However, since the problem occurs with mouse movement, perhaps under the "device" category as it relates to input devices. + +Alternatively, if the issue is about how the display handles the cursor coordinates, it might be under "graphic". But I'm not entirely sure which is more appropriate here. + +Wait, looking at the categories again: the options are device, graphic, etc. Since mouse is an input device, and the problem affects its movement, perhaps "device" is the right category. Alternatively, if it's about the cursor display or window management, then "graphic". + +I'm a bit torn between these two. But considering that the issue is specifically with mouse movement behavior (like hitting walls), which could be due to incorrect handling of input events or device emulation, I think "device" might be more accurate. +</think> + +device \ No newline at end of file |