1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1119861 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1119861
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f1edad743
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1119861
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is talking about poor console performance in Windows 7 when running under QEMU. They provided some timings from different configurations and noticed that QEMU's Windows 7 setup is much slower compared to Windows XP on the same hardware.
+
+So, looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue here seems related to how QEMU handles graphics because they mention different display drivers (QXL, cirrus, vmvga) and note that performance varies significantly. They also tried disabling graphics effects but it didn't help, which makes me think it's about the way QEMU emulates or handles the graphical output.
+
+Wait, the problem is specifically with console performance in Windows 7. The console API might be interacting differently depending on the graphics setup. Since they're seeing this across multiple configurations and drivers, it's pointing towards a graphics-related issue within QEMU's emulation.
+
+So, considering all that, the category should probably be 'graphic' because it's about how the graphical output is handled in QEMU, which affects performance when running Windows 7.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses poor console performance in Windows 7 under QEMU, which varies significantly across different configurations. The issue likely relates to how QEMU handles graphics, as evidenced by testing with various drivers and noting that performance differs based on the graphics setup. Therefore, the category is:
+
+graphic
\ No newline at end of file