1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1461 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1461
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2fd0182b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/graphic/1461
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Virgl on Upstream windows builds?". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I should understand what Virgl is. From what I know, Virgl (Virtual Graphics Layer) is a library used for hardware-accelerated 3D graphics in virtual machines. It's part of the QEMU project and allows better 3D rendering performance in VMs by offloading some tasks to the host GPU.
+
+The bug report mentions "Virgl on Upstream windows builds?" So it seems the user is asking about whether Virgl works with upstream Windows builds, probably referring to compiling or integrating Virgl into Windows-based QEMU builds. 
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to figure out which one fits best. Let's go through them:
+
+- Mistranslation: This would be related to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target in user-mode. Doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code—doesn’t fit either.
+- Other: A catch-all category, but maybe not specific enough.
+- Device: Could relate to hardware devices; Virgl does interact with GPU devices.
+- Graphic: Directly related since it's about graphics acceleration in VMs.
+- The rest like socket, network, KVM, etc., don't seem directly relevant.
+
+So between device and graphic. Since Virgl is specifically for graphics, "graphic" seems the most accurate category. It's about 3D rendering performance in virtual machines using hardware acceleration, which falls under graphics handling in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+graphic
\ No newline at end of file